My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_1210_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_1210_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2012 11:30:24 AM
Creation date
12/6/2012 4:30:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 9 of 13 <br />$52.10 <br />$107.12 <br /> $40 <br /> $60 <br /> $80 <br /> $100 <br /> $120 <br />2012 Sewer Charge Comparison <br /> 258 <br /> 259 <br />In this instance, Roseville sewer charges were lower than most. To get a broader perspective, the following 260 <br />chart depicts the combined water and sewer impact for a typical single-family home for the comparison 261 <br />group. 262 <br /> 263 <br />$130.83 <br />$172.10 <br /> $80 <br /> $100 <br /> $120 <br /> $140 <br /> $160 <br /> $180 <br />2012 Water & Sewer Charge <br />Comparison <br /> 264 <br /> 265 <br />When combined, Roseville is approximately 9% above the average for the peer group. However, it should 266 <br />be noted that most of the cities shown in the chart th at have lower utility rates, happen to have much higher 267 <br />property tax rates. This is an important distincti on because again, each City employs a different philosophy 268 <br />in how it funds the direct and indirect costs of providing services. 269 <br /> 270 <br />271
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.