My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9545
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9500
>
res_9545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:39:06 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 9:30:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9545
Resolution Title
Calling a public hearing on May 26, 1998, 7:15 p.m. on the imposition of service charges within Special Service District No. 1 (4/27/98).
Resolution Date Passed
4/27/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to <br />cause notice of said hearing to be given two publications in the <br />official newspaper. Said publications shall be two weeks apart, <br />and at least three days shall elapse between the last publication <br />and the hearing. Not less than ten days before the hearing the <br />City Manager shall mail notice of the hearing to the owner of <br />each parcel of land within Special Service District No. 1 <br />proposed to be charged a service charge. For the purpose of <br />giving such mailed notice, owners shall be those shown to be such <br />on the records of the County Auditor or, if the tax statements in <br />the County are mailed by the County Treasurer, on the records of <br />the County Treasurer. As to properties not listed on the records <br />of the County Auditor or the County Treasurer, the City Manager <br />shall ascertain such ownership by any practicable means and give <br />mailed notice to such owners. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption <br />duly seconded by member Mastel <br />taken thereon, the following voted <br /> <br />Wiski, Goedeke, Maschka, Mastel and Wall <br /> <br />of the foregoing resolution was <br />and upon a vote being <br />in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and <br />adopted. <br /> <br />933239.1 <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.