2012-06-06_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Page 8 clarified that, in theory, the College had already expanded off-site as owner of the 352 building in question, and the request was whether the building could be used as a nursing 353 school. Mr. Paschke suggested that the Commission keep some separation between the 354 College and the use itself when considering this and other requests from a broader 355 sense. While recognizing the concerns about the campus expanding, Mr. Paschke 356 questioned if this request rises to that level of consideration for additional off-site 357 expansion. 358 Member Lester noted that when this particular building was constructed, roads, access, 359 parking, and square footage were all in reality addressed at that time for the structure. 360 Member Lester opined that the only consideration by the Commission was related to the 361 internal use of an existing building. 362 Mr. Paschke concurred with Member Lester’s observation. 363 To further address Member Strohmeier’s concerns with traffic, Mr. Paschke agreed that 364 higher education facilities create concern for increasing traffic; however, he opined that 365 this type of use occupying an existing building did not. Mr. Paschke noted that, as part of 366 staff’s analysis of the request, consideration was given to whether the proposed use was 367 an appropriate fit in a given area or building; whether there would be any dramatic 368 increase in traffic or whether the existing roads could support it. As part of staff’s overall 369 review, as always but not necessarily detailed in the staff report, Mr. Paschke noted that 370 staff’s experience indicated office buildings generate more traffic and staff had all agreed 371 that the proposed classroom use would generate similar numbers. Even if the building 372 was to be completely used for higher education, Mr. Paschke advised that he was not 373 sure if there would be any detrimental impact on traffic. Mr. Paschke assured 374 Commissioners that staff internally reviewed each application based on a broad array of 375 topics as outlined in City Code; and attempted to apply that Code consistently for any and 376 all applications under review. 377 Member Strohmeier clarified with the applicant that shuttle service would be provided, 378 and thanked the applicant for that service; opining that that was actually part of his 379 rationale in supporting the request. However, Member Strohmeier continued to be 380 concerned with traffic, especially for seniors walking in that area, and reiterated his 381 request that those concerns be flagged or City Council consideration. 382 Vice Chair Gisselquist stated that he would support the request; and opined that, from his 383 perspective; he had appreciated the discussion, finding the proposed use good and 384 instructive in finding out the intent of Northwestern College for this site. From his personal 385 perspective, Vice Chair Gisselquist opined that Northwestern College had proven to be a 386 good partner with the City; and further opined that this use was appropriate; and 387 welcomed those involved in that use and overall benefits to Roseville and the broader 388 community to allow this type of nursing instruction. Vice Chair Gisselquist opined that his 389 only concern was who else may take advantage of the proposed Zoning Text 390 Amendment and Zoning Code that could prove not to be a positive result. Vice Chair 391 Gisselquist questioned the comment regarding the rocky past or confrontational issues; 392 and opined that this request was reasonable in consideration of the other existing 393 educational uses in Roseville as a model. Vice 394 Chair Gisselquist suggested that, whether there was a fear for further Northwestern 395 College campus expansion, others at the City Council level could address those 396 concerns; but he would support this Zoning Code change. 397 Ayes: 5 398 Nays: 1 (Olsen) 399 Motion carried. 400 Staff advised that anticipated City Council action was scheduled for June 18, 2012. 401 6. Adjourn 402