My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_1119
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_1119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2012 12:22:11 PM
Creation date
12/20/2012 12:22:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/19/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 19, 2012 <br /> Page 31 <br /> living facilities, nursing homes and the retail industry were at or just above min- <br /> imum wage. Councilmember McGehee expressed her personal shame in those <br /> wages and the choices faced by those individuals and families trying to have ad- <br /> equate food, shelter, and medical care on limited wages. With 43% of families <br /> in School District No. 623 receiving free or reduced price lunches, Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee noted this was another indication of wage issues in our <br /> own community. <br /> Councilmember McGehee advised that her intent was to put the issue before <br /> people to think about in determining the City's ethical values; and while recog- <br /> nizing that in many cases it would raise the cost for Roseville citizens; she <br /> opined that sometimes more skilled employees and more efficiency balanced <br /> out those costs. Councilmember McGehee recognized that Mr. Roberts' ques- <br /> tions were legitimate to ask as a resident of Roseville, "what is in it for Rose- <br /> ville residents." Councilmember McGehee stated that, for her personally, it <br /> provided a community where she felt that policies of the city government had <br /> not driven someone into the ground. <br /> Councilmember Johnson asked if Councilmember McGehee's intent was that <br /> 100% union forces be used on a project; to which she responded in the negative. <br /> Based on that response, Councilmember Johnson concluded that a mix was <br /> amenable to Councilmember McGehee to which she concurred. <br /> City Manager Malinen advised that of the twenty (20) contracts for the fire sta- <br /> tion construction, seventeen (17) of them were found to be provided by union <br /> workers. <br /> Councilmember McGehee admitted that once she had become aware of that, she <br /> had no further problems with the issue. <br /> Councilmember Johnson noted that, as a business person, he often found that <br /> more craftsmen took on bigger problems, and opined that he welcomed a mix of <br /> workers. Councilmember Johnson further opined that the caliber of contractors <br /> outside union forces didn't typically do large-scale work. While not having had <br /> this discussion going into the fire station project and process, Councilmember <br /> Johnson noted that there were no current policies in place requiring such a bal- <br /> ance or union versus non-union or prevailing wages. Councilmember Johnson <br /> noted that the issue didn't enter into the equation until a resident became dis- <br /> turbed with strikers; and after the facts were uncovered, he didn't have any lin- <br /> gering concerns. <br /> Councilmember McGehee advised that she was basically satisfied with the 80% <br /> level for contracts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.