My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_1203
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_1203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2012 1:05:59 PM
Creation date
12/20/2012 1:05:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/3/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,December 03, 2012 <br /> Page 32 <br /> county related to this dangerous intersection. However, Councilmember John- <br /> son noted that they also didn't anticipate any different results than those already <br /> received. <br /> Councilmember Johnson asked that the City Council take it upon themselves to <br /> earmark money from existing reserves to pay for an electronic crosswalk at this <br /> intersection. <br /> Public Works Director Duane Schwartz provided additional information beyond <br /> the staff report based on previous discussions with Ramsey County. Mr. <br /> Schwartz noted that the average crosswalk signal, similar to that at Central Park, <br /> was in the range of$20,000; with another type of signal to stop traffic (Hawk <br /> Signal) would cost $150,000. However, Mr. Schwartz noted that the Hawk op- <br /> tion would have broader implications to traffic; and require further study to <br /> identify those impacts for the intersection at Lexington and Larpenteur Ave- <br /> nues. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the need to receive permission from Ramsey <br /> County for any type of signal installation, which was typically a local cost. <br /> Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of analyzing some type of signaliza- <br /> tion at this intersection to assist pedestrians. Councilmember Willmus voiced <br /> one concern he had, referencing the signal at Victoria serving a two (2) lane <br /> road, but this one required to serve a five (5) lane road. Councilmember <br /> Willmus expressed concern that the situation not be made worse; and advised <br /> that he would require additional information and examples of similar situations <br /> in other cities; however, he reiterated that he was more than willing to look at <br /> allocating funding for a crosswalk signal. <br /> Mr. Schwartz recognized Councilmember Willmus' concerns; and advised that <br /> staff would return to the City Council with Ramsey County's concerns or issues. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that a personal concern was not having a safe refuge in the <br /> middle of the five (5) lanes, since there was a center turn lane rather than a me- <br /> dian. <br /> Councilmember Johnson opined that cost should not be an issue at all; but that <br /> all due diligence be completed to alleviate this serious situation; further opining <br /> that it was only a matter of time before something happened at the intersection. <br /> Councilmember Johnson asked that future City Councilmembers keep this at the <br /> forefront, opining that it was paramount to the safety of residents in that area; <br /> and asked that the City Council remain fervent in its pursuit of a solution. <br /> At the same time, Councilmember Johnson suggested other opportunities be <br /> taken to visit some other intersections (e.g. Snelling Avenue); and offered his <br /> service as a citizen to keep the ball rolling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.