My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-01-10_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2013
>
2013-01-10_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2013 4:44:23 PM
Creation date
1/4/2013 4:36:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville 2012 -2016 Parks and Recreation Renewal Program <br />Public engagement strategy <br />Page 6 <br />on park use Department staff and <br />consultant <br />Even though no park in the community is the same, meetings should generally following a similar format <br />and agenda to ensure consistency in planning and implementation. Some parks might necessarily have <br />a unique agenda due to circumstances related to that park; defining a park serving Southwest Roseville <br />will require a different approach because a new park is being created and because the creation of that <br />park not only aligns with the direction of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan it satisfies a goals of the <br />city's comprehensive plan. <br />Materials might be presented in PowerPoint to aid in proj <br />a way of demonstrating process and schedule discussio <br />meeting participants to more closely review drawin <br />pace. As a strategy that anticipates meeting partl' is' <br />should be pursued. The PowerPoint can be transla��f�r1p <br />�e enough image of the plan and as <br />IN <br />Na»>display boards will allow <br />other prese j)pn materials at their own <br />needs, having a "Pi' rPoint and hard copies <br />a PDF fill for postiri` /�Whe city's website. <br />Similar to meetings conducted during t s t e r Plan, sibs 'mime will be direcW `to resident and ar <br />FIN <br />stakeholder interactions. Meeting parti , ' I be asserrf in small groups (if enough people are <br />present to allow reasonably sized groups). gen ht be used as the general prototype <br />for most initial meetings duri e concept ter 3 stage � "Oe renewal program: <br />/f� % / / / / / / /a /,,. <br />Initial Concept /Master Plan Meeting Agenda (Meeting 1) <br />Item Topic iption Time allowed <br />„oil <br />T <br />1 Introduction I ctions om'�rks and recreation staff, 2 minutes <br />G %% !9 / /9 / /i / �O' <br />��f� /l�yr %�� .... ���� �� present, consultants <br />2 Par ecr erview va es and key directions 5 minutes <br />Plan as guidf � of `lated in t�, %faster Plan <br />�r .... .... ........ <br />��� Ove� of the renewal program and 5 minutes <br />" j/ mproy nt funding.... <br />........ ....................................................... �� ... ... .... ......... <br />4 Concept pl process scription of the planning process, 5 minutes <br />etings during the planning process, other <br />....... l�ilm <br />portunities for / , <br />r input <br />...... ....... ......... ..... ......... <br />5 Schedule ���� % / / /��� anticipated construction schedule; impacts <br />�cheduIe for planning and design; 5 minutes <br />to park use and programs <br />......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... <br />6 Park conditions (small group discussion) Resident and 15 minutes <br />stakeholder assessment of existing park <br />conditions (comments on an aerial <br />photograph of the park) <br />......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... <br />7 Existing concept plan (small group discussion) Review of 30 minutes <br />review alternative concept plans created during the <br />Master Plan; resident and stakeholder <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.