Laserfiche WebLink
I ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />2 MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 4, 2012 <br />3 ROSEVILLE CITY HALL — 6:30PM <br />4 <br />5 PRESENT: Azer, Boehm, Diedrick, Doneen, Etten, D. Holt, M. Holt, Ristow, Simbeck <br />6 ABSENT: Wall notified staff ahead of time that he was unable to attend due to work conflict <br />8 STAFF: Anfang, Brokke, Evenson <br />9 1. INTRODUCTIONS/ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />10 None <br />12 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — NOVEMBER 1, 2012 MEETING <br />13 Commission Recommendation: <br />14 Minutes for the November 1, 2012 meeting were approved unanimously. <br />15 <br />16 3. PUBLIC TREE MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION <br />17 Jeff Evenson reviewed the Public Tree Master Plan Draft with Commission. Evenson provided <br />18 background information on the original Public Tree Master Plan that was completed in 1995. While <br />19 the earlier information was interesting the original plan was not available in an electronic format <br />20 making it difficult to use with the updated inventory tools and current mapping systems. <br />21 <br />22 The updated Public Tree Master Plan includes three main areas; the inventory of all public trees, <br />23 analysis of data collected through the inventory and a plan for future forestry work and upgrades. <br />24 The current information is fully electronic and will provide for a more streamlined update in the <br />25 future and allows for the use of existing maintenance tracking software for reports that are easily <br />26 integrated. The updated plan also includes references to the updated forestry ordinance and <br />27 information on the economic value of our forest resources. <br />28 <br />29 Commission Discussion: <br />30 • D. Holt commented on the significant number of trees recognized as being in fair or poor <br />31 condition and inquired into how the City plans to address the maintenance needs for trees in <br />32 this condition. <br />33 o Evenson explained that condition status is quite critical and a fair status sounds worse <br />34 that what is experienced by the "non - arborist" public. Maintenance staff is working to <br />35 be more proactive with trimming and pruning trees. <br />36 o Commissioners recognized that what is being done now is unfortunately reactionary <br />37 due to budgetary constraints. <br />38 • Doneen recognized the need to plant in tree spaces now rather than wait until trees are <br />39 diseased or gone — work on changing the tide from reactive to proactive. <br />40 • Doneen commented that he did not see in the report reference to climate changes and <br />41 attention to species that are robust enough to withstand warmer seasons. <br />42 • The commission would also like to see mapping of the invasive species in a similar manner <br />43 so that we can better manage our natural resources. <br />44 • Etten commented on how the County Roads were highlighted on the maps and inquired into <br />45 how the County plays into the updated plan. Etten also suggested the County be approached <br />46 with Roseville's plan so there might be an opportunity to share in the plan for future <br />47 plantings on County Road right -of -ways. <br />48 • Etten spoke to the benefits of our Urban Forest highlighted in the Public Tree Master Plan; <br />49 o Shade allows for an energy savings <br />50 o Trees store COz <br />51 o Trees have an impact on storm water management <br />52 o In the long run, public trees save the City of Roseville money <br />