Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes –Tuesday, November 20, 2012 <br />Page 3 <br />1 <br />At the request of Member Masche, Ms. Kelsey briefly reviewed the provisions of the MOU <br />2 <br />that addressed further discussion between the HRA and City Council for remediation costs, as <br />3 <br />well as the purchase price itself. <br />4 <br />5 <br />Ayes:6 <br />6 <br />Nays:0 <br />7 <br />Motion carried. <br />8 <br />9 <br />10.Information Reports and Other Business (Verbal Reports by Staff and Board Members) <br />10 <br />Ms. Kelsey referenced monthly foreclosure comparisons on an annual basis; noting that all <br />11 <br />communities were moving back toward pre-2008 foreclosure trends, with Roseville trending in that <br />12 <br />direction as well. <br />13 <br />14 <br />At the request of Chair Maschka, Ms. Kelsey advised that, according to tracking by the Area Realtors <br />15 <br />Association, not only sales have increased over the last few months, but median values have increased <br />16 <br />as well. Ms. Kelsey attributed this to less competition from sales of foreclosed properties. <br />17 <br />18 <br />11.Recess <br />19 <br />20 <br />Chair Maschka recessed the business portion of the meeting at approximately 6:10 p.m. and <br />21 <br />reconvened in work session for the purpose of hosting an open forum and receiving public <br />22 <br />comment regarding rental licensing in Roseville. <br />23 <br />24 <br />Rental Licensing Open Forum <br />25 <br />Chair Maschka clarified that it was the HRA’s intent to listen, noting that the process was very <br />26 <br />preliminary at this point, and the interest of the HRA was to hear from rental property owners, <br />27 <br />landlords, tenants, and other interested parties from the community and beyond. <br />28 <br />29 <br />HRA Executive Director Patrick Trudgeon expressed appreciation to the audience for their attendance <br />30 <br />(approximately 30-35attendees), noting the extensive outreach attempted by staff, with approximately <br />31 <br />4,700 mailed invitations being sent out. <br />32 <br />33 <br />Mr. Trudgeon reiterated the comments of Chair Maschka thatthis forum was intended as the first step <br />34 <br />in a long process, and was seenas a listening session. Mr. Trudgeon referenced the CURA report that <br />35 <br />was provided, and available in the back of the Council Chambers, with the report including comparable <br />36 <br />information on rental licensing of other communities. <br />37 <br />38 <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that the HRA was seeking comment related to multi-family rentals and potential <br />39 <br />licensing of that housing in Roseville from various perspectives, especially those in attendance at <br />40 <br />tonight’s forum. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the City had no program in place yet, and was still <br />41 <br />researching options, but noted the importance of recognizing this mostly unregulated housing segment <br />42 <br />in the community, with 5,000 rental units, or 1/3 of the housing stock in Roseville. Mr. Trudgeon noted <br />43 <br />that the majority of those rental properties are well-maintained and well-managed; but there was <br />44 <br />ongoing concern that as that housing stock continued to age, it could lead to issues down the road, with <br />45 <br />the intent to ensure that the City was aware of housing stock conditions and provide assistance as <br />46 <br />necessary. <br />47 <br />48 <br />Mr. Trudgeon referenced the community vision in the Imagine Roseville 2025 documents, and one of <br />49 <br />its goals to vigorously enforce housing codes in the City through implementation of housing <br />50 <br />inspections. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this focus on multi-family properties in Roseville was shared by <br />51 <br />the City Council to make sure all properties continued to sustain themselves and provide a positive <br />52 <br />impact on surrounding neighborhoods and the community as a whole. Mr. Trudgeon reiterated that, <br />53 <br />while the majority of properties in Roseville were an asset to the community, there were a problem few <br />54 <br />with repeat problems and issues, some of which were able to be addressed through the City’s recently- <br /> <br />