My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 9:44:25 AM
Creation date
1/17/2013 3:42:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/22/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Data Analysis of City of Roseville Recyclable Materials <br />■ The amount of contaminants collected via the single stream method was higher <br />than the dual stream method. <br />Comparison of Single Stream and Dual Stream Collection <br />Methods <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the September and October Monday <br />single stream pilot routes were significantly different than the September and October <br />dual stream routes. <br />The results of comparing the single stream and dual stream collection methods in <br />September and October include: <br />• The single stream routes yielded increased quantities of paper compared to the <br />dual stream routes; <br />• The single stream routes generated less quantities of metals, glass and plastics <br />than the dual stream routes; and <br />• The quantities of contaminants in the single stream routes were higher than the <br />quantities of contaminants found in the dual stream routes. <br />On average, the quantities collected during the pilot from single stream collection <br />routes were greater than from dual stream routes. However, more data sets are needed <br />to draw definitive conclusions. <br />Comparison of the Current Dual Stream Bi- Weekly Method to <br />the Dual Stream Weekly Method <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the weekly dual stream collection routes <br />were not significantly different than the bi- weekly dual stream (control) routes. Thus, <br />the materials composition is projected to remain similar. <br />It appears on a monthly basis that greater quantities of materials are likely to be <br />collected with weekly collection as compared to bi- weekly collection. However, more <br />data sets are needed to draw definitive conclusions. <br />Comparison of the Current Dual Stream Bi- Weekly Method to <br />the Dual Stream Bi- Weekly Method with Additional Education <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the bi- weekly, dual stream with <br />additional education collection routes were not significantly different than the bi- <br />weekly dual stream (control) routes. Thus, the materials composition is projected to <br />remain similar. <br />It appears that additional data sets are needed to draw any definitive conclusions as it <br />relates to quantities set out for collection using the two approaches. <br />B1605 13-17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.