Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix B <br />Table 19 <br />Comparison of Dual Stream Routes <br />Before vs. During Pilot <br />Seven samples were sorted trom the July dual stream routes. <br />2Thirteen samples were sorted from the dual stream routes. <br />3The totals may not equal the sum of the material categories due to rounding. <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the dual stream routes during the pilot <br />program were not significantly different than the dual stream routes before the pilot <br />was initiated. Thus, the July composition results can be considered representative of <br />dual stream collection for the City of Roseville. <br />Summary <br />The results of the comparative analysis of the pilot routes are summarized below. <br />Comparison of the Monday Collection Routes <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals from both the September and October <br />Monday single stream pilot routes reflect a statistically significant difference when <br />compared to those of the July (pre- pilot) dual stream route. Thus, the materials <br />composition is projected to change when comparing single stream to dual stream <br />collection. <br />When comparing the material compositions by weight for the Monday collection <br />routes, the results include: <br />■ The quantities of paper collected via the single stream method (September and <br />October) increased compared to the quantities collected via the dual stream <br />method (July); <br />■ The quantities of metals, glass, and plastic decreased with the single stream <br />collection method; and <br />B-16 B1605 <br />Tues- Friday Dual Stream Routes' <br />Tues- Friday Dual Stream Routes 2 <br />July (Before) <br />September & October (During) <br />Statistically <br />90% Confidence <br />90% Confidence <br />Significant <br />Interval <br />Interval <br />Difference <br />Material <br />Mean <br />Lower <br />Upper <br />Mean <br />Lower <br />Upper <br />Category <br />Paper <br />61.3% <br />52.7% <br />69.9% <br />61.5% <br />54.7% <br />68.2% <br />Metals <br />6.6% <br />4.3% <br />8.9% <br />7.1% <br />5.6% <br />8.6% <br />Glass <br />18.7% <br />13.1% <br />24.3% <br />18.4% <br />12.3% <br />24.4% <br />Plastic <br />9.9% <br />5.4% <br />14.4% <br />9.6% <br />6.7% <br />12.5% <br />Contaminants <br />3.5% <br />2.4% <br />4.6% <br />3.5% <br />2.6% <br />4.4% <br />Tota13 <br />100% <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />100% <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />Seven samples were sorted trom the July dual stream routes. <br />2Thirteen samples were sorted from the dual stream routes. <br />3The totals may not equal the sum of the material categories due to rounding. <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals of the dual stream routes during the pilot <br />program were not significantly different than the dual stream routes before the pilot <br />was initiated. Thus, the July composition results can be considered representative of <br />dual stream collection for the City of Roseville. <br />Summary <br />The results of the comparative analysis of the pilot routes are summarized below. <br />Comparison of the Monday Collection Routes <br />The upper and lower confidence intervals from both the September and October <br />Monday single stream pilot routes reflect a statistically significant difference when <br />compared to those of the July (pre- pilot) dual stream route. Thus, the materials <br />composition is projected to change when comparing single stream to dual stream <br />collection. <br />When comparing the material compositions by weight for the Monday collection <br />routes, the results include: <br />■ The quantities of paper collected via the single stream method (September and <br />October) increased compared to the quantities collected via the dual stream <br />method (July); <br />■ The quantities of metals, glass, and plastic decreased with the single stream <br />collection method; and <br />B-16 B1605 <br />