My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 9:44:25 AM
Creation date
1/17/2013 3:42:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/22/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
review committee <br />Member Willenbring asked what Commission members should do before the next <br />meeting regarding this subject. Schwartz asked Tim Pratt if the next step for <br />the Council on August 8th was a draft Request for Proposal. Pratt said they <br />could go to that step if that was the recommendation. Schwartz said in that <br />case comments and recommendations from Commission members should be made within <br />the next couple of weeks so they can be presented to the Council. Greg <br />Schroeder, City Councilmember, stepped up and said he didn't think this was a <br />fair request. They weren't giving Tim enough direction on what they wanted. <br />Schwartz said the Council would make the ultimate decision on how it will be <br />bid. He suggested they wait for Council direction on what they expect in terms <br />of Commission involvement. <br />Member Fischer asked what decision the Council will be making on August 8th. <br />Pratt said that he would be presenting this same draft report to them and that <br />Schroeder had already asked for a month to review the information. Pratt would <br />then return to Council in another month for direction. Member Fischer said then <br />they would also have a month to consider the information and make comments. <br />Schwartz and Pratt agreed. <br />Member Marasteanu stated that he thinks the single- stream program is the way to <br />go. He said the report was full of good information and that it is obvious to <br />him that single- stream is the way to go. <br />Chair Wilke said that based on the report he thinks it's pretty obvious that <br />residents want a single- stream program. Chair Wilke moved to recommend to <br />Council that they draft a Request for Proposal for a single- stream program. <br />Member Willenbring seconded. <br />Member Willenbring asked if they really need to see an RFP. The Council will be <br />making the actual decision. He said the RFP is just paperwork staff has been <br />filling out for years and bringing it to the Commission for approval is a waste <br />of everyone's time. <br />Member Shiely said he'd be very cautious about not going through the bidding <br />process when we're spending $250,000. Chair Wilke said he thinks that's a <br />decision staff has to make. <br />Chair Wilke said he thinks they should make a recommendation to Council that <br />the Commission support a single- stream RFP. <br />Member Fischer pointed out that even though the report shows 92.5% liked <br />single- stream, less than half of them were willing to pay more to get it. The <br />report seems to show that whatever program residents were on, that's what they <br />preferred. He said he'd like to see what people would chose if they were given <br />all the options. <br />Chair Wilke said he was in a single- stream pilot area, and the collection <br />seemed to take less than half the time. <br />Member Fischer said he'd like to make a recommendation to Council for an RFP <br />that included several different options. <br />John Kysylyczyn pointed out that the price between single- and double - stream is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.