My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 9:44:25 AM
Creation date
1/17/2013 3:42:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/22/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Waste Management, EFL Superior and Walter s) collected 71% of the total tons of trash in He <br />two counties in 2000 compared with 42% in 1995. While the four smaller haulers that serve <br />Roseville (Gene's, Highland, Homgan's, and Mudek) collected 3.1% of the total tons of trash in <br />the counties compared to 2 5% in 1995. In 1991 Superior was not doing business in Roseville <br />The other three held 86% of the residential routes. According to He 2002 resident survey 98% of <br />Roseville homeowners contract with one of the big four haulers. <br />Waste }hierarchy <br />Minnesota Waste Management In 1980 Hehm erota Legislature <br />$ established an order of preference for <br />Hierarchy' managing waste in order to protect the <br />state's envronment and public health <br />Reduction and Renee This preferential order is shown on the <br />Hart at left. <br />Recycling <br />Food and Yard! Waste CnmpoeNng Recognizing that solid waste pro ses a risk <br />to the environment no matter how it is <br />Resource �wvery managed, the Legislature placed waste <br />reduction and recycling at the top of the <br />LandfllDiiscal� m hierarchy. The less waste pro duced and <br />He more material recycled the less the <br />Landfill Dic�oeA need for processing or Gsposal .Laudeell <br />disposal is at the bottom ofthe hierarchy <br />Laed d because of pollution and related liability <br />concerns and the lost opportunity to use waste as a resowcc <br />However this waste management order of preference is not being met The mount of garbage <br />produced by each Minnesotan has increased 23% since 1993 to more than a ton per person in <br />2001. Meanwhile the ate of recycling in So seville and Minnesota has been stagnant over He <br />past ten years. And the mount of garbage being sent to landalls is increasing. This comes even <br />though Minnesota leads the nation in the amount of garbage processed at resource recovery <br />facilities that turn garbage into a fuel to be burned at electricity generating plants. <br />In addition to He State hierarchy, Ramsey County has a Solid Waste Management Plan in which <br />it seeks to minimize waste, prevent pollution, promote efficiency, and provide a sustainable <br />innastmcture for solid waste management To do that, Ramsey County has established five <br />goals <br />® Manage wastes to protect the environment and public health, and to conserve <br />resources <br />® Manage wastes using a variety of methods according to the State's hierarchy, in order <br />to minimize landftlling <br />® Manage wastes cost effectively and minimize potential liability for citizens <br />businesses and taxpayers <br />® Encourage waste generator responsibility for environmentally sound waste <br />management <br />® Allocate costs fairly to users. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.