Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix A <br />City of Roseville <br />Analysis of Processing Residuals <br />The project team of R. W. Beck and Dan Krivit and Associates (Project Team) <br />completed a "desk -top" analysis of residuals as produced from the Waste <br />Management, Inc. (WM) materials recovery facility (MRF) in Minneapolis in relation <br />to the City of Roseville's (City) curbside recycling pilot collection study. This <br />analysis of processing residuals is the Project Teams' analysis of available data on the <br />issue of processing residuals given that there were no independent measurements of <br />outputs from the WM Minneapolis MRF. <br />This analysis is divided into the following sections <br />• Background/Problem Statement <br />• Available Data from the City of Roseville Pilot Project <br />• Summary of WM Study at its Minneapolis MRF <br />• Other Available Data <br />• Policy Implications <br />• Recommendations for Additional Study <br />• Bibliography of References Cited <br />• Attachment A -1 — Primer on Definitions <br />• Attachment A -2 — Additional Discussion of the WM Study at its Minneapolis <br />MRF <br />• Attachment A -3 — Excerpts from the City of Shoreview Recycling Contract: <br />Processing Residuals Requirements <br />Background <br />Many communities are considering changing their recycling programs to single - stream <br />systems. The City of Roseville conducted a pilot collection study in 2004 to test the <br />residents' response to a variety of collection design changes, including two pilot routes <br />testing single- stream recycling. One of the key components in quantifying the overall <br />impacts of collection design choices is the need to estimate the change in "processing <br />residuals from the MRF" as one indicator of environmental impacts. <br />Changing a collection design impacts many system variables: <br />■ Overall participation may increase or decrease due to increased convenience <br />(e.g., less sorting, wheeled carts); <br />B1605 <br />