Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix A <br />■ Individual household recovery rates may increase (more recyclable materials <br />set out and less trash) affecting the relative composition of the recycling <br />stream; <br />■ More "non- targeted materials" may be set out by residents for recycling; <br />■ The collection crews may not inspect the recycling bins at truck -side for non- <br />targeted materials (if lidded carts are loaded with semi - automatic or automatic <br />lifting devices on board the curbside recycling vehicles); <br />■ Once delivered to a MRF, the relative percent and absolute tons of "processing <br />residuals" output for disposal may increase; <br />■ Once sorted and processed at the MRF, the individual recyclable commodities <br />(e.g., bales of newspaper, aluminum cans, etc.) may have more or less <br />"contaminants" depending on MRF design, management and operations; <br />and/or <br />■ There may be more or less glass breakage throughout the collection and <br />processing stages such that the relative output of color - sorted glass vs. color - <br />mixed, broken glass changes. <br />Beyond "processing residuals ", other potential environmental and health impacts of <br />collection system changes include: <br />■ Overall or "net' recovery of recyclable material (i.e., more or less tons actually <br />recycled); <br />■ Efficiency of collections (e.g., change in curbside truck payloads, routing, <br />etc.); <br />■ Worker health and safety (e.g., manual vs. automated lifting; centralized <br />processing requiring manual sorting, etc.); and <br />■ Composition of recyclables, commodities products, and processing residuals. <br />Because independent, actual field measurements were not conducted as a part of the <br />Roseville pilot project, this analysis does not empirically quantify the "process <br />residuals" but rather discusses the available data as reported in other studies. Also, the <br />policy implications are outlined and recommendations for further research itemized. <br />Standard Dermitions - Currently the recycling industry lacks standardized <br />definitions. This is one of the key barriers to professional dialogue about designing <br />studies to measure impacts of changes to single- stream recycling programs. The <br />following set of terms is proposed to the City and Ramsey County as a basis for such <br />discussion (see Attachment A -1 for a more thorough set of proposed definitions and <br />examples.) <br />"Non - Targeted Materials" - Materials that are defined by the municipality as <br />not acceptable but are routinely included by residents in their curbside bins. <br />"Processing Residuals" - Materials that are disposed as mixed solid waste as <br />an unwanted by- product after processing of recyclables at MRFs. <br />A-G B1605 <br />