Laserfiche WebLink
� 06 f. A 10 foot buffer area with screen planting and an opaque wall or fence between 6 <br />� 07 and 8 feet in height shall be required between the drive-through lane and any <br />108 pNOperty line adjoining a residentially zoned property or prope�ty in residential use. <br />�09 This requirement does not apply because the drive-through lane is not adjacent to a <br />� � o residential property. <br />111 5.1 Roseville's Development Review Committee, a body comprising staff from various City <br />� � 2 departments, met on September 13 and 20, 2012 to review and discuss the proposal. The <br />� � 3 only comments which have not been addressed above are the following standard <br />114 development items that are regulated by various Code requirements: <br />� � 5 a. All of the water leaving the site needs to be treated. The site needs to demonstrate <br />116 that the existing pond still meets the runoff requirements for the development. This <br />117 can be done by showing that the pond contours are the same as the original approved <br />� � 8 site plan. Sediment deltas, voluntary trees and any other maintenance items should be <br />� � s addressed as a part of this redevelopment. <br />120 <br />121 <br />122 <br />123 <br />124 <br />b. The drainage report submitted with the application only shows proposed drainage <br />areas; a drawing showing the existing drainage areas will be necessary. <br />c. A Rice Creek Permit is needed. <br />d. Review by MnDOT drainage is needed, this site drains directly to MnDOT right of <br />way. <br />� 25 e. The proposal generally complies with standard zoning requirements, but building <br />� 26 elevations, site screening, and other zoning regulations will be evaluated at the time a <br />� 2� building permit application is submitted. <br />128 S.2 <br />129 <br />130 <br />131 6.� <br />132 <br />133 <br />134 <br />135 <br />136 <br />137 <br />138 <br />Review of the proposed drive-through facility against the coNDiTroNaL usE standards <br />and criteria leads Planning Division staff to conclude that the use can meet all pertinent <br />requirements. <br />REVIEW OF PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />6.1 Soon after the Slawik Park 4t" Addition plat was filed in 1994, its 41ots were combined <br />into a single tax parcel to better accommodate the development of the Roseville <br />Crossings shopping center. In order to sell the pertinent portion of land area to <br />Walgreens, the property owner intends to un-combine the platted lots, and proposes to <br />reconfigure the parcel boundaries to slightly shrink the Walgreens parcel and to realign a <br />portion of the boundary common to Lots 3 and 4 so that the boundary no longer bisects <br />the existing building. <br />� s9 6.2 The proposed PaxcEL RECO1vrs�aTioN is illustrated in the sketch included with this <br />�4o report as Attachment D. Starting in the southeast corner, platted Lot 1 would be made <br />�4� smaller by moving the northern boundary about 32 feet southward as represented by <br />� 42 Parcel A; Lot 2 would remain unchanged; Lot 3 would shrink slightly by relocating part <br />� 4s of its eastern boundary further to the west as represented by Parcel C; and Lot 4, as <br />144 represented by Parcel B, would be enlarged by the outward relocations of its southern <br />145 and western property lines. <br />PF12-018 RCA_102212 (2) <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />