2012_1203_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

To: Phone: Attachment C-2 SURVEY of PAST PERFORMANCE (Client) (Name of person completing survey) 1�� Survey ID Code: (Ciry Assigned) Shaded area will be redacted and replaced with a Respondent identification code prior to evaluation. Subject: Past Performance of: (Name of Firm) (Name oflndividuals) The City of Roseville is implementing a process for Request for Proposals that collects past performance of firms and their key personneL The firm/individual listed above has listed you as a client for whom they have provided legal service. We would appreciate your taking the time to complete this survey. Rate each of the criteria on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/individual again). Please rate each of the criteria to the best of your knowledge. If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, please write "not applicable." � 3. � . _ . .: : Analysis o Critical issues are typically and appropriately identified. o Questions are clearly answered. o The analysis identifies other related issues implicated in the question asked, even if not directly identifed by the original request for advice. Advice o Advice is practical and not merely iheoretical. o Advice is politically astute. o Advice is legally accurate, as evidenced by it being upheld by the Courts upon challenge. o Advice is proactive — it identifies City issues in Code interpretation and/or missing authority. Written Product o Product is easily read. o Issues are correctly identified and the answers are easily discerned from the letter/opinion. o The length of the response is appropriate to the question asked. Timeliness of Response o Responses are provided to meet client needs. Page 15 OVERALL RATING (1-io) � � � �