2012_1203_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.,_ In addition, the use of a separate steering committee or task force has been used s: previously on Twin Lakes issues (the Twin Lakes Stakeholder panel) and the a<�� Comprehensive Plan Update with mixed results. Staff has heard frustration from past 3_�� participants that all their work within those processes was either ignored or changed with 3F� the final decisions by the City Council. s � If there is a desire by the City Council to involve more people or groups on the steering 3� committee, staff would recommend that all five of the City Council members be the on 3�� the steering committee with additional people added as desired. 4c As much as possible, the steering committee work and pub]ic interactions should take ��. place on non-Council meeting nights. This allows for better focus on the issue and ensures that appropriate time can be given to Twin Lakes. Public Outreach � Staff recommends that an extensive citizen engagement be undertalcen using both 4: traditional and non-traditional methods to gather input about Twin Lakes. ac Staff would proposed numerous opportunities for input including regularly scheduled 4� public input at seven Steering Committee meetings, at least four listening sessions to 4�� gather initial input, individua] meetings with Twin Lakes property owners and other 4�� stakeholders. Staff also proposes meeting with the Planning Commission, the Parks and 5c Recreation Commission, and the Public Works, Environment, and Transportation 5� Commission to gather their input as well. Once a draft report is released, at least two 5� public comment opportunities will be made available. As the process wraps up, there will 5�� be public comment opportunities at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 54 Staff would also plan using the website to gather input and possibly use social media, 5:� Next Door and the Roseville Patch to assist in gathering input. A combination of mailed 5�. notices, push emails, and the use of inedia outlets will help get the word out that input is 5 � wanted. 55 59 PYOC2SS�7'1Y12211122 6C s^ Staff has created a draft outline of what the process could look like. The process contains s.- seven milestones: 6�: s� Milestone #1 — Introduction of previous documents, brainstorming, and discussion s: of desired outcomes of process. sc ➢ Steerin� Committee Meeting #1 s, ➢ Discussion of outcomes/expectations of process, past history of Twin s� Lakes, and brainstorming of ideas for the future of Twin Lakes. 65 �r Milestone # 2 Gathering of initial community input ��. ➢ What does the general community want to have happen in the Twin �; Lakes area? �:- ➢ Numerous input sessions �F� o Will try to have them at different times- evenings, daytime, Page 2 of 4 weekends.