My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_1203_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_1203_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:41:20 PM
Creation date
1/25/2013 2:41:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o Presence at City-wide events (Living Smarter Fair, Oval <br />� Activities), etc. <br />o Ability to receive input online. <br />� o Up to seven general public listening sessions over a two-month <br />period. <br />o Input sessions would have background material and ask for <br />� direct input (What should develop in Twin Lakes?, What <br />� should not?) as well as any other input regarding Twin Lakes <br />generally. <br />,. o Property Owners Listening Sessions One-on-one meetings <br />� between staff and property owners within Twin Lakes <br />� Redevelopment Area. <br />f� � o Identified Stakeholders Listening Sessions — One-on-one <br />meetings between staff an identified stakeholders. <br />o Meetings with City Commissions/Boards-Staff will attend City <br />Commission meetings to gather input about Twin Lakes. <br />➢ Steerin� Committee Meetin� # 2 After listening sessions, staff will <br />compile input and report back to Steering Committee. <br />��, Milestone #3 "Experts" input <br />➢ Steering Committee Meeting #3 <br />➢ Gather "experts" for panel discussion of the development of Twin <br />�� Lakes. <br />➢ Who should we get?/What type of disciplines? (Like Navigating the New <br />���� � Normal). <br />��_� ➢"Expert" panel should comment on the input gathered so far as well as <br />�- offering opinions and analysis on what would work in Roseville. <br />1 <br />��� Milestone # 4 Review of input and thoughts received to date, direction to staff regarding <br />�: draft report, relase of draft report <br />� �. � ➢ SteeNing Committee Meeting #4 <br />� �: ➢ Recap of community and expert input. <br />�: ➢ Based on that input and desires of Steering Committee, direction should be <br />�.; given to staff regarding draft report. <br />� ° ➢ Steerin� Committee Meetin� #5 <br />�: ➢ Review of draft Twin Lakes report and final changes. <br />���� ➢ Authorize the release of report document. <br />1' <br />� Milestone # 5 Community input- does draft report meet expectations? <br />� ➢ Public meetings to review draft report with public and to gather comments. <br />� ➢ Combination of presentation and open house. <br />�� ➢ At least two public meetings. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.