My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_1210
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_1210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2013 10:33:54 AM
Creation date
1/30/2013 10:33:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/10/2012
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,December 10, 2012 <br /> Page 16 <br /> With City Council consensus affirmative with his comments, City Manager Ma- <br /> linen further clarified that the water usage rate had been excluded from this ac- <br /> tion;however, the water base rate as recommended would be adopted for 2013. <br /> With City Council consensus affirmative with his comments, Councilmember <br /> Willmus also clarified that this action would also reduce the 2013 residential <br /> customer recycling rate to $6.00 per unit per quarter. <br /> Councilmember McGehee requested a more in-depth discussion in 2013 regard- <br /> ing storm sewer and sanitary sewer rates. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that there was nothing preventing the City Council from <br /> changing its rate structure beyond statutory requirements. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the extensive additional fees and in- <br /> creased levies asked of Roseville residents in 2013, whether tax-supported or <br /> non-tax-supported, were significant. While addressing many of the business <br /> model shortcomings from the past through the CIP recommendations adopted, <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that general operations needed to be reviewed <br /> for funding sources in the future. As a taxpayer and resident of Roseville, <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she didn't think the City should have giant <br /> blips on the screen if operations were being managed properly; and going for- <br /> ward, a business model should be in place that provided a direct pass through <br /> for costs that provided transparency for the public to be fully aware of the ra- <br /> tionale for any increase in fees, as well as to provide a means for the City to <br /> capture all expenditures for the services it sold. Councilmember McGehee stat- <br /> ed that she supported what the City Council was doing now; however, she <br /> wanted additional discussion in the near future. <br /> Councilmember Johnson stated that he was in agreement with the first portion <br /> of Councilmember McGehee's statement; acknowledging that the actions taken <br /> by the City Council were harsh; however,they were necessary to get the City on <br /> a sustainable track; and it was necessary to turn that corner. Councilmember <br /> Johnson noted that the discussions held and public testimony received about that <br /> major step taken and impact on taxpayers and residents had been taken seriously <br /> by the City Council last year, and had served as the impetus for enacting those <br /> changes over a two-year period, versus the original recommendation for imple- <br /> menting them in one year. Councilmember Johnson concurred with Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee that management needed to be carried forward and annual- <br /> ly scrutinized; and now that the base had been put in place, the City Council <br /> needed to move forward accordingly and the conversations needed to continue. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the whole point of the actions taken by the City Council <br /> over the last two (2) years were to avoid the spikes from unexpected expenses <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.