Laserfiche WebLink
<br />----_. <br /> <br />JIJL 22 '98 02:42PM PET, BELL,CONV,JENSE <br /> <br />P.3/4 <br /> <br />2. The site was designated as LB, limited business, in the comprehensive plan and <br />designated for neighborhood related commcrcial, residential or mixed use in the <br />recently adopted Comprehensive Plan amendments whieh were based on a study <br />of the entire neighborhood. <br /> <br />3. The site is zoned B-1, limited business and B-2 retail business bascd on historical <br />uses of the property. Surrounding zoning is residential or limited business. <br />Surrounding uses are limited business. commercial recreation, public recreation <br />and residential. <br /> <br />4. The adopted comprehensive plan and amendments provide guidelines to ensure <br />the planlled, orderly and staged development and redevelopment of the area <br />consistent with the plan recommendations for the emire area prepared by the <br />James Addition Task Force. <br /> <br />5. The proposed conditional use permit is inconsistent with the zoning and plan in <br />that no form of auto service facility is a permitted or conditional use in any LB <br />plarming district and parallel B-1 zoning district. Therefore, the application is <br />inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />6. The lìmited business, residential or mixed use designation emphasizes <br />compatibility with the neighborhood. A B-2 retail use attracts activities <br />incompatible with the neighborhood interest. <br /> <br />7. Traffic generated from comparably sized uses in a retail versus a limited husiness <br />district are two to three timcs grearcr exposing (he neighborhood to unnecessary <br />additional outside traffic incompatible with local circulation and traffic objectives. <br /> <br />8. The proposed site plan screens, fences ánd separates the parcel from adjacent <br />parcels and the public park. Rather than building on the neighborhoods assets, <br />it seeks to separate itself from the neighborhood negatively impacting on the <br />property values of the area. <br /> <br />9. The proposed auto service installation/accessory facili[y negatively affects the <br />public health, safety and welfare of the area, irnpac£ing property values by failing <br />to integrate with the community, adding traffic beyond that anticipated by <br />neighborhood related uses, creating safety problems related to JIS incompatibility, <br />and endangering the health and safety of residenL'\ and children by separating and <br />fencing the site from [he adjacent community park. <br />