My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9567
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9500
>
res_9567
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:39:11 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 9:31:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9567
Resolution Title
Denying a Conditional Use Permit to National Tire and Battery for an auto service installation/accessory facility at 2561 Snelling Avenue North (7/27/98).
Resolution Date Passed
7/27/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />----_. <br /> <br />JIJL 22 '98 02:42PM PET, BELL,CONV,JENSE <br /> <br />P.3/4 <br /> <br />2. The site was designated as LB, limited business, in the comprehensive plan and <br />designated for neighborhood related commcrcial, residential or mixed use in the <br />recently adopted Comprehensive Plan amendments whieh were based on a study <br />of the entire neighborhood. <br /> <br />3. The site is zoned B-1, limited business and B-2 retail business bascd on historical <br />uses of the property. Surrounding zoning is residential or limited business. <br />Surrounding uses are limited business. commercial recreation, public recreation <br />and residential. <br /> <br />4. The adopted comprehensive plan and amendments provide guidelines to ensure <br />the planlled, orderly and staged development and redevelopment of the area <br />consistent with the plan recommendations for the emire area prepared by the <br />James Addition Task Force. <br /> <br />5. The proposed conditional use permit is inconsistent with the zoning and plan in <br />that no form of auto service facility is a permitted or conditional use in any LB <br />plarming district and parallel B-1 zoning district. Therefore, the application is <br />inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />6. The lìmited business, residential or mixed use designation emphasizes <br />compatibility with the neighborhood. A B-2 retail use attracts activities <br />incompatible with the neighborhood interest. <br /> <br />7. Traffic generated from comparably sized uses in a retail versus a limited husiness <br />district are two to three timcs grearcr exposing (he neighborhood to unnecessary <br />additional outside traffic incompatible with local circulation and traffic objectives. <br /> <br />8. The proposed site plan screens, fences ánd separates the parcel from adjacent <br />parcels and the public park. Rather than building on the neighborhoods assets, <br />it seeks to separate itself from the neighborhood negatively impacting on the <br />property values of the area. <br /> <br />9. The proposed auto service installation/accessory facili[y negatively affects the <br />public health, safety and welfare of the area, irnpac£ing property values by failing <br />to integrate with the community, adding traffic beyond that anticipated by <br />neighborhood related uses, creating safety problems related to JIS incompatibility, <br />and endangering the health and safety of residenL'\ and children by separating and <br />fencing the site from [he adjacent community park. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.