Laserfiche WebLink
February 20, 2013 <br />Item 7 <br />Strategic Plan <br />with the full HRC referring other matters to committees for advice and review, <br />and serving as an executive committee, as a standing or operations committee. <br />Vice Chair Singleton advised that a final draft of the revised by-laws would be <br />ready for review by the full HRC at their September monthly meeting, and then <br />forwarded to the City Council for their consideration. <br />Chair Grefenberg advised that, once the HRC reviews this draft of the by-laws <br />they would want to meet with City staff and receive input from the City Council, <br />since they didn't want to do a lot of additional work if the City Council would <br />radically revise them; and opined that through working with the City Manager, <br />the HRC should get a better sense of where they were in agreement, and further <br />fine-tuning was needed or revisions to the City Ordinance, originally written in <br />1968 and last revised in 1975; and needing to address the duties of the Civic <br />Engagement Task Force. <br />Chair Grefenberg advised that the HRC had been approached by outside groups <br />suggesting that the City was not responsive enough, specifically a recent incident <br />with the City's Police Department and its SWAT Team. Chair Grefenberg opined <br />that it would be helpful to the HRC to get guidance from the City Council on its <br />role and to get some sense on specific issues. In the Police Department issue, <br />Chair Grefenberg advised that the HRC waited until the regular processes had <br />been followed; however, he was aware that there were some lingering concerns <br />in the community that should be addressed without the HRC becoming an <br />overseer of the Police Department. Chair Grefenberg opined that this had been a <br />problem in the past, and questioned the preference of the City Council in whether <br />the HRC should provide a forum for citizens of if they should go through the City <br />Council process. <br />Member Thao noted that, from her understanding, the SWAT Team issue involved <br />someone with special needs, not just the police process itself; and suggested a <br />need to address how to handle mental health issues in those circumstances. <br />Councilmember Pust concurred that this was exactly the issue. Councilmember <br />Pust expressed her appreciation for the work the HRC had done to-date; and <br />expressed her advocacy to think about diversity broadly, including abilities and <br />disabilities across the entire age demographic. Councilmember Pust clarified that <br />this was in no way a reflection on the Police Department doing things differently; <br />however, she noted that they admitted and were pursuing more training in <br />similar situations. Councilmember Pust opined that it would be an appropriate <br />role for the HRC to be involved in such a process if they were aware of resources; <br />and offered her personal partnership to the HRC in such future endeavors. <br />Mayor Roe opined that it made sense to partner with any and all City <br />departments where they could make connections; noting that the City's Fire and <br />Police Departments are already doing a lot of outreach that may be available for <br />the HRC to tie into. Mayor Roe noted that HRC facilitating relationship-building <br />among various interest groups was a great idea; and if adding cultural events <br />and activities to the annual Rosefest festivities was possible, the more <br />connections the better for everyone. <br />HRC Current Status Review of 2012 Strategic Plan and 2013 Revisions & Initiatives 1 1 <br />