Laserfiche WebLink
February 20, 2013 <br />Item 7 <br />Strategic Plan <br />In noting different abilities, Councilmember McGehee opined that all are not <br />noticeable. <br />Councilmember Johnson opined that the parameters and responsibilities alluded <br />to by Councilmember Pust were good. Councilmember Johnson noted that the <br />Police Department had already made adjustments on how to handle similar <br />situations in the future; and only if the HRC observed that those adjustments <br />were not happening would it be their role to step in. <br />Vice Chair Singleton noted that issues with the Police Department and the HRC <br />had occurred several years ago, and opined that the HRC currently had a good <br />rapport with all City departments and staff. <br />Councilmember Johnson concurred, noting that different leadership styles were <br />currently in place. <br />In addressing Chair Grefenberg's concerns with the lack of staff support <br />available, Councilmember Willmus questioned the number of subgroups currently <br />operating under the HRC umbrella. <br />Chair Grefenberg advised that there were currently four (4) standing committees <br />of three (3) or fewer members (plus staff) of the HRC to avoid conflicts with the <br />Open Meeting Law; and if additional members were involved, the HRC posted the <br />meeting. Standing committees included: Program Planning Committee; Advisory <br />Committee with students and others interested in minority issues; Outreach <br />Committee with other communities; and the Civic Engagement Task Force. Chair <br />Grefenberg noted that, the current meeting schedule of the Civic Engagement <br />Task Force in the evening, even though staff support was not available, had <br />allowed younger families to participate in that process. <br />Councilmember Willmus questioned if those individual subcommittees needed to <br />remain focused on one area, or if their functions could merge in the future. <br />Councilmember Willmus further questioned if Chair Grefenberg saw the Civic <br />Engagement Task force sun-setting as most task forces did, or if he was it as an <br />ongoing Advisory Commission moving forward. <br />With regard to the task force, Chair Grefenberg noted that the HRC had outlined <br />some issues needing more attention moving forward, especially in the <br />marginalized and minority communities; and advised that the draft report coming <br />forward in the near future recommended an ongoing role for those Civic <br />Engagement efforts, while not addressing what form it may take, whether a <br />separate Commission or a subcommittee of the HRC. Chair Grefenberg noted <br />that the Task force had consumed a fair amount of time, but expressed his <br />appreciation of the creative contributions and civic activists already in place, as <br />well as involvement of new people throughout the community in this dynamic <br />group. Chair Grefenberg noted that there was significant interest from those <br />citizens in continuing to play a role; however, without more staff support he <br />wasn't sure that was possible. <br />HRC Current Status Review of 2012 Strategic Plan and 2013 Revisions & Initiatives I Z <br />