Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 28, 2013 <br /> Page 16 <br /> Regarding safety concerns, Ms. Messer opined that reconstruction of the road cre- <br /> ated the potential for people to drive faster than 43 mph, and spoke in support of <br /> 30 mph signage based on her twenty-year history on the street. Ms. Messer ques- <br /> tioned if installation of a sidewalk would increase safety or reduce risks for stu- <br /> dents, suggesting that lower speeds would make the street more livable. Regard- <br /> ing the driveway grades, Ms. Messer expressed concern with icy conditions in <br /> winter and the ability to stop backing out of her driveway, creating additional <br /> concerns if pedestrians or bikers were on a sidewalk. While the street was based <br /> in two different communities, Ms. Messer stated that it was still one neighbor- <br /> hood. <br /> Doug Schumacher,948 County Road D <br /> Mr. Schumacher spoke in support of installing a sidewalk between Chatsworth <br /> and Churchill for safety and crossing considerations. However, when moving on <br /> to Hafner and the current versus proposed intersection, Mr. Schumacher noted the <br /> need to often walk over a mound of snow or wait until buses leave the school site <br /> to reach two of the main intersections. Mr. Schumacher also addressed his con- <br /> cerns with speed for safety considerations, opining that keeping the speed at 30 <br /> mph versus 35 mph would meet the needs of the neighborhood better, especially <br /> elderly people and/or younger children using the street. <br /> Mayor Roe closed the Public Hearing at approximately 8:38 p.m.; and asked Ms. <br /> Bloom to address those specific questions brought up by public speakers that were <br /> in her domain. <br /> Ms. Bloom clarified that the Pathway Master Plan had been in place for thirty <br /> (30) years; however, it had been updated in 2008. <br /> Regarding speed along County Road D, Ms. Bloom apologized for misrepresent- <br /> ing the speed during her presentation, clarifying that the feasibility report was cor- <br /> rect at 43 mph. Ms. Bloom reviewed the process for setting speed limits through <br /> the Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation, school speed zones (already in <br /> place), and proposed flashing speed boards. Based on recent studies done on <br /> Snelling Avenue and Ford Parkway, Ms. Bloom advised that it had been found <br /> that flashing signs actually caused people to slow down. Ms. Bloom advised that <br /> she would consult with the City of Shoreview for the possibility of having the <br /> speed boards on beyond school times. Ms. Bloom further highlighted the 85th Per- <br /> centile, based on Police Department records and common practice; and the pro- <br /> cess for requesting changes to the Commissioner of Transportation through a city <br /> petition, based on completion of a traffic study of existing speeds and recom- <br /> mended land use. Ms. Bloom advised that the study would determine the speeds <br /> at which people are traveling, and would not necessarily result in lower speed lim- <br /> its, often indicating a higher speed limit was put in place. Ms. Bloom advised that <br /> a petition could be filed with the Commissioner of Transportation as part of the <br /> project scope or outside it, as directed by the City Council. <br />