Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, August 21, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />1 <br />None. <br />2 <br />3 <br />9. Action/Discussion Items <br />4 <br />5 <br />a.Ratify Strategic Plan <br />6 <br />Executive Director Patrick Trudgeon noted completion of the 2012-2016 Strategic Plan <br />7 <br />document; and following the joint meeting of the City Council and HRA Board on July 23, <br />8 <br />2012, the City Council offered their support of the revised goals and objectives of the <br />9 <br />Roseville HRA, and had suggested no changes. Therefore, Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff <br />10 <br />was presenting the final copy, consistent with previous versions, and recommending that the <br />11 <br />HRA Board, if in agreement, adopt the 2012 – 2016 Strategic Plan. <br />12 <br />13 <br />Motion: Member Lee moved, seconded by Member Elkins to adopt the 2012 – 2016 <br />14 <br />Strategic Plan as presented. <br />15 <br />16 <br />Ayes: 5 <br />17 <br />Nays: 0 <br />18 <br />Motion carried. <br />19 <br />20 <br />b.2013 Levy <br />21 <br />Executive Director Trudgeon highlighted the preliminary 2013 budget and Roseville HRA <br />22 <br />levy, as detailed in the Request for HRA Action dated August 21, 2012. Mr. Trudgeon noted <br />23 <br />that, formulation of the annual budget was in accordance with State Statute and the budget <br />24 <br />procedure of the City in the same manner as required of its various departments. Mr. <br />25 <br />Trudgeon noted that while the HRA has levy authority, the final approval is through the City <br />26 <br />Council, with staff’s presentation to them scheduled for Monday, September 10, 2012. Mr. <br />27 <br />Trudgeon advised that this budget had been reviewed and recommended by the HRA Finance <br />28 <br />Committee. <br />29 <br />30 <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that this budget represented the maximum levy allowed for the HRA to <br />31 <br />impose in 2013, $698,471; and represents a 50% increase from the 2012 levy of $353,500. <br />32 <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that the impact on a median value home in Roseville of $187,600 would <br />33 <br />be approximately $34 annually, up from the current $17 of the past year. Mr. Trudgeon noted <br />34 <br />that the HRA levy had remained steady with no increase over the last three (3) years. For the <br />35 <br />benefit of the public, Mr. Trudgeon noted that this increased levy authority was due to the <br />36 <br />revised strategic plan initiatives as detailed in the report. <br />37 <br />38 <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed those items that were new (Comprehensive Housing Study, increased <br />39 <br />staffing costs for additional hours for the Housing Program Manager and support staff as <br />40 <br />needed, and Economic Development initiatives) as well as those remaining from previous <br />41 <br />budgets, some receiving additional funds and others remaining at current levels. One of those <br />42 <br />items remaining in the budget was for training of HRA Board Members, and Mr. Trudgeon <br />43 <br />encouraged Board Members to take advantage of those training opportunities since they were <br />44 <br />included in the budget and typically available at a nominal cost. <br />45 <br />46 <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that there was a small contingency from reserves and unexpended <br />47 <br />programming dollars from 2012 that could be moved to 2013. While this represented an <br />48 <br />ambitious budget as the HRA moved into new directions consistent with the approved <br />49 <br />Strategic Plan, Mr. Trudgeon noted that other items had been scaled back where possible. Mr. <br />50 <br />Trudgeon noted that, if the City Council did not approve the maximum levy as recommended, <br />51 <br />there would be additional areas needing to be cut back. <br />52 <br />53 <br />Chair Maschka stated that the great majority of the budget was supported by the Strategic Plan, <br />54 <br />with the rest flat if not reduced, other than the Housing Study update. <br />55 <br /> <br />