My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0311_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0311_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2013 3:30:00 PM
Creation date
3/7/2013 4:06:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, November 20, 2012 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />adopted nuisance ordinance, in an effort to make the C ity safe and law abiding and provide quality 1 <br />housing in its neighborhoods. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Mr. Trudgeon briefly highlighted the HRA’ recent strategic planning efforts identifying as one priority 4 <br />the need to create and maintain quality and sustainable housing options; as well as a priority identifying 5 <br />and/or eliminating blight on individual properties and neighborhoods. Mr. Trudgeon advised that it was 6 <br />the HRA’s intent to partner with the City in developing regulations to develop a better understanding of 7 <br />what is actually needed. Mr. Trudgeon assured the public that this was not a random idea, but had been 8 <br />under discussion for over five (5) years in addressing multi -family properties in the community and that 9 <br />those properties remain a good resource for the City. As neces sary, Mr. Trudgeon advised that tools 10 <br />were available and some yet to be identified and implemented to address problematic properties. 11 <br /> 12 <br />HRA Housing Program Manager Jeanne Kelsey summarized the CURA report referenced by Mr. 13 <br />Trudgeon in other first -ring subur bs as well as stand -alone communities, and in rural MN, thirteen (13) 14 <br />communities in all, and compared their best practices to regulate multi -family housing in a community 15 <br />as potential options . Ms. Kelsey noted that most applicants for licensing were in spected pre -license, 16 <br />usually starting on an annual basis, and thereafter inspections may be based on only a percentage of 17 <br />units annually depending on that initial inspection and conditions found. Ms. Kelsey referenced 18 <br />inspections in Brooklyn Center (based on the building’s valuation and subsequent rating). Ms. Kelsey 19 <br />noted some use third party inspections versus in -house City staff inspections. However, Ms. Kelsey 20 <br />advised that the most important issue is that penalties were enforced for those properties n ot kept in 21 <br />order or found in violation of standards, with those penalties dependent on the classification tier, and in 22 <br />conjunction with Police and Fire Departments in coordinated efforts. Ms. Kelsey advised that the HRA 23 <br />and City preferred to emphasis commu nication and education/outreach efforts with landlords and rental 24 <br />property management to address exterior building code violations, to reduce or eliminate repeat 25 <br />nuisances from criminal activities in those buildings; and potentially through use of a crime -free 26 <br />addendum to lease agreements, providing landlords the ability to evict tenants for that type of violation. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mr. Trudgeon concluded staff’s introduction by encouraging input from audience members, or if they 29 <br />preferred, through providing that input via mail, or by e -mail from linking to the City’s website. Mr. 30 <br />Trudgeon stressed the desire to hear all perspectives, and to ensure all have opportunities to share their 31 <br />thoughts, comments, and suggestions. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Ms. Kelsey reiterated that this discussion is preli minary in nature, and public engagement throughout 34 <br />the process, regardless of the final recommendations. Ms. Kelsey noted that, if attendees signed up on 35 <br />the sheet at the back of the room with their e -mail, staff would include them on future e -mail notice s 36 <br />and meetings as the process moved forward to the next step. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Public Comment 39 <br />Dick Houck , Roseville Resident 40 <br />Mr. Houck referenced his written comments, apparently previously e -mailed, and asked that they be 41 <br />entered into the record, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mr. Houck asked if this was an effort initiated by the HRA or by the City Council. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Chair Maschka clarified that the City Council would ultimately make the decision on any licensing 46 <br />program; noting that this was an extremely complex issue with multiple and significant alternatives. 47 <br />Chair Maschka noted, from a personal perspective, that his preference was to incentivize positive and 48 <br />responsible rental property ownership and management; and that the intent of the HRA as a body was to 49 <br />continu e to glean an understanding of the problem, solutions that work and those that do not, and 50 <br />determine a direction to recommend to the City Council for the community of Roseville. 51 <br /> 52 <br />Mr. Houck noted that the country had just endured nine (9) months of politica l rhetoric; and from his 53 <br />perspective, this reeked of another instance of government intruding on private businesses and applying 54 <br />additional fees or taxes from the associated costs of such a program. Mr. Houck stated that “it looks to 55
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.