My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0225
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 12:46:50 PM
Creation date
3/29/2013 12:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/25/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,February 25, 2013 <br /> Page 21 <br /> From that conceptual level, Mr. Miller moved to the realities for Roseville over <br /> the last two-year cycle, with 2012 being year two of that cycle. Mr. Miller re- <br /> viewed components at this time beginning with review of the 2011 CPMP, an an- <br /> nual financial review by the external auditors as well as quarterly financial up- <br /> dates to the City Council by staff, the mid-term review and correction and priori- <br /> ties shifted in 2012 as well as addressing new costs needing adjustment and sub- <br /> sequent revised 2013 budget as approved by the City Council in December of <br /> 2012. <br /> With the City Council's formal adoption in May of 2012 of the CPMP, Mr. Miller <br /> advised that Department Head based their strategic plans on those City Council <br /> goals and vision, presented to the City Council in August of 2012, identifying ac- <br /> tion plans to achieve those goals; now projected in 2013 as part of their depart- <br /> ment program components. <br /> Since the strategic plan was done, Mr. Miller suggested that in real life, the next <br /> step was how to build on it, which would drive an update of the CIP, set budget <br /> and program priorities by the City Council in March or April of 2013, and affirm <br /> and refine financial policies. Once that was done, Mr. Miller advised that devel- <br /> opment of the next biennial budget could occur. Mr. Miller noted that tremen- <br /> dous staff resources went into that process, but that when City Manager Malinen <br /> presented his City Manager-recommended biennial budget in June or July of <br /> 2013, it represented the 100 to 1000 hours collectively put in by staff. Mr. Miller <br /> noted that the commitment of time needed by the City Council would also be <br /> time-consuming and continue into the second year of the cycle. <br /> City Manager Malinen noted that staff continued to look forward beyond a <br /> 2014/2015 biennial budget to future biennial budgets in order to provide that <br /> long-term, sustainable decision-making. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, since the Strategic Plan was already done <br /> by the previous Council, the new City Council members should be allowed to <br /> weigh in. . <br /> City Manager Malinen advised that discussions were underway to determine how <br /> best to accommodate council membership changes due to elections. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that given changing economics over the course <br /> of a year,the Strategic Plan needed revisiting anyway. <br /> City Manager Malinen advised that a mid-biennial reviewed allowed such an op- <br /> portunity to determine what if any budget adjustments were needed, similar to the <br /> process followed in 2012 for the current year 2013. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.