My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0225
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 12:46:50 PM
Creation date
3/29/2013 12:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/25/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,February 25, 2013 <br /> Page 22 <br /> Mayor Roe reminded Councilmembers that the City Council's Strategic Plan <br /> looked out into the next two (2) bienniums, and noted that the years being consid- <br /> ered for development of a strategic plan were with 2013 as year 1, or technically <br /> speaking in 2012, with the current City Council doing goal setting and strategic <br /> plans for 2014 — 2017. From the point of view of a strategic plan that was not <br /> meant to be written in stone, Mayor Roe opined that it made sense for new City <br /> Councilmembers to reaffirm prior Council actions early in that first year, as well <br /> as revisiting them when looking at the next biennium. Mayor Roe suggested the <br /> addition of an additional "bubble" on the CPMP Chart to accomplish that. <br /> Mr. Miller confirmed staff's receptiveness to the process evolving, noting that it <br /> was envisioned in the budget calendar and due to come before the City Council in <br /> March. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that terminology was vital for transparency and <br /> public understanding if the biennial budget was to continue; suggesting that the <br /> annual budget for year one be called that, with year two called a "forecast," to <br /> better establish what was actually being done. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested a `Biennial Budget Plan," with annual budget adoption as <br /> statutorily required; however, he opined that"forecast" sounded too unofficial. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that, for the public's benefit, which distinction <br /> needed to be drawn and the obligation for adoption of an annual budget needed to <br /> remain clear to the public. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the need for the City Council to make a commitment to a two- <br /> year plan, not just call year two a "forecast," since previous efforts at an annual <br /> budget were found to be unsustainable, as noted by Mr. Miller. <br /> Mayor Roe cautioned that the City Council not get stuck on terminology, opining <br /> that a budget was essentially a plan. <br /> City Manager Malinen advised that, subsequent to the last City Council meeting, <br /> Department Heads had discussed that, and their conclusion was not to change the <br /> years, but to develop a particular mechanism in this year recognizing elections <br /> and how to accommodate that input, with a final recommendation pending from <br /> staff's perspective, but at least on the radar, in an effort to provide a window of <br /> opportunity within the budget cycle to allow newly-elected Councilmembers to <br /> amend the strategic plan and drive a budget. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred that the City Council was getting stuck on <br /> terminology; however, she opined that words do matter and this needed to be <br /> fleshed out and a decision made and documented, whether an annual or biennial <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.