My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0311
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 12:53:54 PM
Creation date
3/29/2013 12:53:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/11/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Replace Page 6, Line 34 to 45: (Some corrections) <br /> Councilmember McGehee provided an update on the Hotel Task Force which she chairs. At the <br /> last meeting, a tentative plan of action was drawn up and after review by the Task Force <br /> members; it will be transmitted to the Council for their information. Councilmember McGehee <br /> advised that the task force had been expanded to include trafficking of young people as it is a <br /> county and state-wide issue. She referenced contacts with the office County Attorney and <br /> Roseville's two school districts. She mentioned the Safe Harbor program which provides shelter <br /> to homeless and abused youth and the "Minnesota Girls and Not for Sale" group. She said that <br /> she was struck by the lack of acknowledgement and services for young boys and plans to <br /> continue to research that issue individually. She is hopeful that the group can continue to work <br /> "off line" with the county and school districts to make a positive contribution to the community, <br /> the county, and state-wide efforts to protect all our youth from abuse and exploitation. <br /> Replace Page 17,Line 32-36: (Clarification) <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that a number of the items showed little movement historically <br /> and didn't seem to anticipate any movement. She questioned if given that status, whether some <br /> of them could be removed. She suggested that perhaps there might be a policy established to <br /> indicate a specific time period of"no change"to an item deemed satisfactory after which the <br /> item could be removed or place on a hiatus. <br /> Page 22,Line 11 to 13: (Clarification) <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that since the Strategic Plan was already done, it would be <br /> unfortunate if the new City Council members were not allowed to weigh in the Strategic Plan <br /> before going forward. <br /> Page 24, Line 23: (Clarification) <br /> gency medical, police, fire, and debt service), stating that these services do not require"ranking". <br /> Page 28, Lines 2 to 4: (Clarification) <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted the possibility of the need for another, other than salt, type <br /> treatment where the roadway drains directly into lakes, streams, or wetlands—citing the wetland <br /> near Lake Josephine along Lexington Avenue. She referenced state and metro recent concerns <br /> regarding salt as a pollutant in public waterways. <br /> Page 30, Line 43: <br /> Reinstate"attached hereto and made a part hereof," <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.