My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0318
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 12:56:25 PM
Creation date
3/29/2013 12:56:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/18/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 18,2013 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 6. Approve Minutes <br /> a. Approve Minutes of February 25,2013 Meeting <br /> Mayor Roe noted several remaining items for discussion in the February 25, 2013 <br /> meeting minutes, specifically his efforts in summarizing the public comments <br /> from the draft minutes submitted by the recording secretary and staff. Mayor Roe <br /> advised that his summary attempt was not intended to diminish those comments <br /> or provide editorial comment on them, but simply to find a balance in recording <br /> business being transacted and to streamline and reduce meeting minutes wherever <br /> possible, rather then a verbatim transcript. However, if the Council preferred a <br /> more detailed record of the meeting minutes, Mayor Roe stated that he would ac- <br /> cept their guidance. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she preferred the draft version submitted by <br /> the recording secretary, with minor typographical and grammatical corrections, as <br /> a more accurate record rather than a summary. Councilmember McGehee further <br /> stated that she had also submitted her version of a summary of the public com- <br /> ments from that meeting as an alternative to Mayor Roe's summary; and opined <br /> that the will of those City Councilmembers present at that meeting was not to ac- <br /> cept that summary either. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that it was the Council's choice as to the content of their official <br /> meeting minutes. <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that as long as the meeting minutes were electronic, <br /> rather than simply paper copies taking up space, he found the more detailed meet- <br /> ing minutes as a useful resource for his research of decision-making processes. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte concurred with leaving the more detailed record of the <br /> public comments, as amended to include grammatical and typographical editing. <br /> In another item, Mayor Roe noted past City Council discussions related to bench <br /> handouts and the final determination by the Council as to whether or not they <br /> were included in the final record of meeting minutes, further noting that this re- <br /> mained an option for each meeting on a case by case basis. Mayor Roe stated that <br /> his concern in including all bench handouts as part of the official meeting minutes <br /> was that some of them became cumbersome and may not be appropriate or neces- <br /> sary to the official record. As an example, Mayor Roe noted his preference that <br /> staff reports provided as bench handouts with corrections or additional infor- <br /> mation could be more appropriate if substituted in the final meeting packet mate- <br /> rials for the record, rather than confusing the issue if more than one report was in- <br /> cluded for an agenda item, with one in the meeting agenda packet materials and <br /> one as a bench handout and attached to the meeting minutes,when those corrected <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.