Laserfiche WebLink
172 <br />173 6. Recycling Community Values Discussion Continued <br />174 Additional materials had been provided since the agenda packet distribution, and <br />175 were provided as a bench handout attached hereto and made apart hereof. <br />176 Member Felice also provided, as a bench handout attached hereto and made a <br />177 part hereof, her Recycling Community Values rankings. <br />178 <br />198 Member DeBenedet, commenting on his rationale in weighting, advised that the <br />199 environmental benefits were one of the main reasons the recycling program was <br />200 in place. While also placing significant importance on the outreach category as <br />201 well, while some of the subcomponents should be made standard requirements of <br />202 the request for proposals (RFP), and not requiring weighted at all, since if you <br />203 didn't meet the basic requirements of the RFP, you were not considered a <br />204 responsible bidder. <br />205 <br />206 However, Chair Vanderwall suggested some judgment may be required to <br />207 determine how, when and if a particular vendor was sincerely attempting to <br />208 reduce their carbon footprint. <br />209 qW <br />210 In the outreach section, Member DeBenedet suggested that effective education of <br />211 residents should remain a measurement; however, the annual report an what <br />212 happens to materials should be submitted to Mr. Pratt and forwarded to the <br />213 PWETC, at which time they could determine if was sufficient or not. Member <br />214 DeBenedet referenced the reports being provided by the current vendor as a <br />215 standard for future reports /vendors. <br />216 <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />