Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 25,2013 <br /> Page 11 <br /> heart of that issue by creating a specific permitted use and then clarifying it within <br /> that district, allowing for those protections. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the specific and higher standards beyond in- <br /> dustrial standards that address adjacent residential areas; need to separate the Tar- <br /> get retail area from this proposed use; and the likelihood that Target would ever <br /> develop as a limited production use negating any need to protect that area. <br /> At Councilmember Willmus' concerns regarding the Wilbert Vault property as an <br /> example of a limited production/processing use adjacent to a residential area and <br /> ensuing problems, Mayor Roe responded that that particular use would likely be <br /> grandfathered in, since it was now zoned Office Park, would be a legal, non- <br /> conforming use, but unable to expand further under that designation and offering <br /> protection to adjacent residential properties. Based on the current requirements <br /> for parking, drainage, and other standards with the rezoning now in place, Mayor <br /> Roe noted that impacts to neighboring properties had been sufficiently addressed <br /> for any redevelopment. <br /> Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, TABLING this item for staff to return with <br /> further recommendations and/or options. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Etten; McGehee; and Laliberte. <br /> Nays: Roe. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that it was conceivable that staff may return with their same <br /> recommendation. <br /> Mr. Paschke sought clarification from the Council on what impact was being reg- <br /> ulated beyond concerns about this type of use adjacent to residential properties. <br /> b. Adopt a Zoning Text Amendment Creating a Definition for Limited Ware- <br /> housing and Distribution and Permitting as Permitted and Conditional Uses <br /> within the Regional Business and Office/Business Park Districts <br /> Mr. Paschke briefly reviewed this proposed companion text amendment, as de- <br /> tailed in the RCA dated March 25, 2013. Mr. Paschke clarified the difference in <br /> what was done inside the building versus trucks outside the building. During his <br /> research while drafting the proposed definition for limited warehousing and dis- <br /> tribution, Mr. Paschke advised that he reviewed that same area and its predomi- <br /> nant uses with a variety of trucks. Therefore, Mr. Paschke advised that he had <br /> formulated the limit of eight (8) vehicles permitted, and any additional vehicles <br /> requiring a Conditional Use. Mr. Paschke further clarified that there was current- <br /> ly no such definition in code. <br />