Laserfiche WebLink
Human Rights Commission Minutes <br />April 17, 2013 — Draft Minutes <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />49 receive feedback from the local teachers. One comment obtained was that due to testing <br />5o requirements and budget constraints, Roseville Area Middle School RAMS may have to stop <br />51 participating. <br />52 �s <br />53 Doneen also noted the RAMS was participating in the Maplewood Human Rights poster contest <br />54 in addition to the essay contest. One teacher suggested the essay contest be changed to allow <br />55 students to submit posters as well. She explained to the teacher that the essay contest rules were <br />56 established by the League. <br />57 <br />58 Chair Grefenberg �� su egg sted the Roseville HRC could approach the League to allow <br />59 essay submittals to be made in ���r�+�� poster format. Program Planning Committee Chair <br />60 Doneen added that after that discussion. the HRC could consider a boster contest. There was <br />6l <br />62 <br />63 <br />64 <br />65 <br />consensus to this approach, ruled the Chair. . <br />. . . .. . �. _.. ... .. .. . . . .. .. . _. .. . .. - � - -� - <br />� - - <br />l.�AlR�f�TI� I������ ����_A�1�l���i���nl9�f�1�1��1 ����I��/��A14• <br />66 Commissioner Ka•�g Thao explained the Roseville High School had received funding for social <br />67 iustice and the visual arts, and stated the es� op ster contest could thus possibly be integrated <br />68 into the High School curriculum. <br />69 <br />70 <br />71 <br />72 <br />73 <br />74 <br />75 <br />76 <br />77 <br />78 <br />79 <br />80 <br />Commissioner Groff questioned how poster submittals would be judged by the HRC. <br />Committee Chair poneen then reviewed the revised essay contest � scoring process in <br />further detail. <br />Chair Grefenberg thanked Commissioner poneen for her work on ��gthe essay contest <br />process and rubric. <br />81 Commissioner poneen moved and Commissioner Singleton seconded a motion to approve the <br />82 revised essay contest process and proposed rubric for 2013-2014 as proposed b,y Committee <br />83 Chair poneen. Motion passed unanimously. <br />84 <br />85 Committee Chair poneen then discussed the revised rating sheet and noted five points has now <br />86 been added for personal relevance to the rating sheet. <br />87 <br />88 Chair Grefenberg suggested personal relevance be worth more than five points. T�° ���^^°�+°a <br />89 . Commissioner poneen explained the reasoning behind assi�g <br />90 that criteria 5 points, a position with which Commissioner Brisbois a�r�� The Commission was <br />91 in favor of keeping the personal relevance at five points. <br />92 <br />