My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2013 10:13:33 AM
Creation date
6/5/2013 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/20/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 20, 2013 <br /> Page 35 <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested submission before June 3rd of a written list <br /> of criteria for dissemination to everyone. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that information may not be available by then, and that an- <br /> other Special meeting may be required. <br /> Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of a Special meeting, opining it would <br /> be beneficial. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that, before June 3rd, staff poll City Councilmembers for <br /> optional dates, even a Saturday morning if necessary, to determine workable <br /> dates. <br /> Ms. Bacon advised that she would be out of town the weekend after Memorial <br /> Day,but would be available otherwise. <br /> Ms. Bacon requested whether the intent was for a uniform document with every- <br /> one supplying the same types of information (e.g. education level) or a more free <br /> form. <br /> Mayor Roe expressed preference for free form, and suggested one of the exercises <br /> at the Special meeting would be to consolidate those elements and reach consen- <br /> sus. <br /> Councilmember Willmus suggested that it may be interesting to have a standard- <br /> ized portion for education and experience, followed by a free form portion. <br /> The 2006 questionnaire was used as an example, with the top ten and then free <br /> form. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, it was determined that the City Coun- <br /> cil had yet to decide on a national, regional or local search; with Councilmember <br /> Laliberte opining that a determination would be helpful o define search parame- <br /> ters. <br /> Councilmember Willmus, in retaining his 90-day window, advised that he was as- <br /> suming a local/regional search at the most. <br /> Ms. Bacon noted that the City used neo.gov for all application processes, and that <br /> it was a national program with anyone wishing to apply able to access that pro- <br /> gram. Ms. Bacon suggested that additional criteria (e.g. living within the five <br /> state region or experience with the State of MN government),but as far as posting <br /> the position it would be posted on applicant tracking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.