2013_0610_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment A EA3,2013RP XTRACT FROM THE PRILOSEVILLELANNING CM OMMISSIONINUTES a. PROJECT FILE 0017 Request by Roseville Planning Division to amend Section 1009.06 Zoning Changes of Title 10 Zoning Ordinance to clarify the initiation process for a zoning map and/or zoning text amendment (PROJ-0017) Chair Gisselquist opened the Public Hearing for Project File 0017 at approximately 7:40 p.m. City Planner Paschke reviewed this requested TEXT AMENDMENT to the Purpose Statement (Section 1009.06) for the purpose of clarifying and expanding what entities could initiate a zoning map and/or text amendment to be consistent with State Statute allowances versus the language created by staff in 2010 for that Purpose Statement. At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Paschke defined “planning agency” as the Commission and/or Planning Staff, either one defined as an agency in accordance with State Statute. Mr. Paschke advised that the current code didn’t spell it out, and it was creating a conflict with the Zoning Ordinance, and after being brought to the attention of the City Attorney, and supported by that office, it was determined to be prudent to clarify the process to facilitate conducting business. At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Paschke and Mr. Lloyd reviewed how and when a property owner, by petition of at least 50% of property owners per current State Statute and City Code could initiate the process, with City Code defining those boundaries elsewhere. Chair Gisselquist closed the Public Hearing at approximately 7:48 p.m. MOTION Member Daire moved, seconded by Member Cunningham to recommend to the City Council APPROVAL of the proposed TEXT AMENDMENT, as detailed and based on the comments and findings of Section 4-6, and the recommendation of Section 7 of the staff report dated April 3, 2013. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Motion carried.