My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0603
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2013 11:20:28 AM
Creation date
6/11/2013 11:20:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/3/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 03, 2013 <br /> Page 25 <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that it depended; questioning how the grand <br /> scheme could possibly look like the development along Grand Avenue. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that the CMU does not have to be development that is compa- <br /> rable to the Excelsior or Grand projects. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the regulating map was very specific and <br /> unique related to aesthetics, form and design, with some uses appearing to follow <br /> that. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that several corridors had really developed and <br /> some work put in place (e.g. medical center, hotel, and this building) and ques- <br /> tioned whether those areas were part of the discussion moving forward or only <br /> those areas more ripe for redevelopment. <br /> Mr. Paschke opined that those newer developments should be excluded. <br /> When he considered zoning, Councilmember Willmus opined that he was looking <br /> at parcels ripe for redevelopment in the next 10-15 years. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon concurred, using the buildings in this immediate area as an exam- <br /> ple, opining that vacant parcels were ripe for development, even though many of <br /> the older buildings and businesses remained viable. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the <br /> question was should they be included in Twin Lakes with special zoning designa- <br /> tion (e.g. east of Fairview Avenue) for those still viable, but others with outside <br /> storage not as desirable. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the question was whether those, including truck terminals <br /> fit the City's future vision for that area or not. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that those properties would start to redevelop in <br /> the near future; and thought they should be included in the Twin Lakes Redevel- <br /> opment Area. <br /> Mr. Paschke noted that some of those east of Fairview (e.g. trucking companies) <br /> were not currently expensive uses on those parcels; but if one of them consolidat- <br /> ed or moved, the property would then be worth looking at for redevelopment by <br /> developers depending on the zoning in place and permitted uses. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that they were mostly office/warehouse uses now, <br /> clarified as office/showroom uses, but thought they should be included in guiding <br /> documents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.