CC_Minutes_2013_0603 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 03,2013 Page 30 Mayor Roe asked that staff provide better designation on a map of those parcels already developed; and the rezoning of Lots 11, 14 and 16 as part of the district, not as separate zoning. Councilmember McGehee opined that she had no problem grandfathering current uses; however, Mayor Roe noted that the zoning designation could hinder any ex- pansion of their current use. Further discussion included few inconsistencies at this time (e.g. medical) other than two parcels east of Fairview and preference to retain them in the community. Mr. Lloyd sought clarification on the context for a new zoning district, whether only applicable for Twin Lakes, or to newly-developed areas similar to what is currently being applied. Councilmember Willmus opined that he could not respond until meeting with property owners. In response to Councilmember McGehee for how that might fit with his concerns about the Har Mar Mall area, Councilmember Willmus advised that an opposite side of the coin was that you could focus review of CB but with regard to the Twin Lakes area, it could have implications in other places in the community. Additional discussion included which of the blocks on Table 1022-1 displayed were included or excluded, and whether to include those expected to be redevel- oped or those more contiguous parcels; consideration of existing uses to continue or expand; past visions related to current visions and realities; past considerations during Costco discussions and support for various housing components; walkable amenities without an urban context; necessary dialogue with property owners to inform the discussion; and potential retail for the area beyond what is already be- ing developed. Mr. Trudgeon suggested the dialogue with property owners to further inform dis- cussion, and suggested outlining things in the meantime to keep the process mov- ing; and providing a map with different colors for those parcels successfully de- veloped already. d. Discuss Utility Services—Recycling Councilmember Willmus explained his request for this discussion was a carryover from previous discussions with former City Manager Malinen last year in a re- view of various City departments as defined in City Ordinance, with the recycling function currently administered directly under the City Manager's position. In re- viewing the function and how it has been administered over the years, Coun- cilmember Willmus questioned if recycling was more a function of the Public Works Department, especially with the PWETC's involvement in various aspects of the program as part of their review and oversight. If the City Council affirmed