My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf07-002
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2007
>
pf07-002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 2:13:20 PM
Creation date
6/14/2013 2:00:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
07-002
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1050
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville, MN - Official Website <br />on a limited piece of property; and questioned why square footage <br />considerations were not part of the EAW to meet those rules and <br />thresholds, with buildings and specific locations clearly identified. Ms. <br />McGehee opined that part of the problem was with City Code and policies <br />governing land use issues, and the entire review process; and further <br />opined that this EAW was meaningless. <br />Ms. McGehee addressed the proposed location of the new dormitory to be <br />located too close to the shoreland. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the latest revised proposal had relocated the <br />dorm to the other side of the existing dorm. <br />Ms. McGehee opined that this proved her point, that nothing in the <br />document was firm; there were no final designs; no known square <br />footages; and noted that the applicant "was so sure no one would look at <br />this, they included the 1986 design for the dorm into the 2007 EAW." <br />Ms. McGehee questioned the actual environmental stewardship being <br />done on campus; amount of acreage reserved for cover and vegetation <br />for habitat as requested by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR); <br />and questioned the actual acreage claimed by the College for forest and <br />woodland. <br />Curt Tally, 3 blocks from campus <br />Mr. Tally advised that he frequently walked the campus; and noted that <br />students and professors had recently removed Buckthorn on campus, <br />providing evidence to him that there was a concern of students and staff <br />for the environment. Mr. Tally opined that no College was perfect; <br />however, rather than distrust, he chose to trust that the College was <br />increasing their commitment to reducing on global warming and other <br />environmental concerns, not just on campus and regionally, but <br />worldwide, similar to that being done by other businesses. <br />Marie Churchward, 3093 Asbury <br />Ms. Churchward expressed her concerns for increased noise, recognizing <br />that growth and expansion were natural and would probably continue. <br />Ms. Churchward opined the need for the City to continue to grow, and <br />that residents were needed to provide input into the City's future. Ms. <br />Churchward noted the ongoing efforts of the College in negotiating with <br />neighbors and addressing their concerns. Ms. Churchward read a <br />prepared statement, in which she encouraged "all to be good stewards <br />and protectors, and to take charge of the land around us; to be sensitive <br />and provide a rightful balance to the future. <br />http://www. ci.roseville.mn.us/archive.asp?AMID=&Type=&ADID=23 0 <br />Page 6 of 16 <br />09/24/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.