Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />(record reference made in 1975). The Commission report also has eliminated reference to <br />action on a PLANNED LJNIT DEVELOPMENT and does note that a petition was <br />submitted seeking an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Further, the record <br />included a general site development plan titled "Proposed Campus Master Plan" which <br />was slightly different than the 1979 version due to the modifications supported by the <br />City Council (Exhibit on file in Community Development Department). <br />8 8.5 The Planning Division met with Northwestern College and their representatives to review <br />9 the project and the comments of the February 7, 2007 Planning Commission <br />10 hearing/meeting. TKDA (consultant) has prepared a response to the questions raised at <br />11 the hearings with both the Arden Hills and Roseville Planning Commission's (see <br />12 attachment). <br />13 <br />14 8.6 The Planning Division believes that a specific setback from the eastern property line must <br />15 be established. In review of the proposed structures that would be constructed on the east <br />16 side of the Campus (dormitory and parking ramp) our recommendation is that this setback <br />17 be established at a minimum of 75 feet from the eastern property line. <br />18 <br />19 8.7 The Planning Division also supports specific language that requires the setback area be <br />20 screened. Staff recommends that screening be consistent with the City Code affording a <br />21 mix of berming, fencing and landscaping to be placed within the 75 foot setback area. <br />22 <br />23 8.8 The Planning Division further supports a condition that requires that any proposed <br />24 construction project meet the requirements of § 1016 (Shoreland, Wetland, and Storm <br />25 Water Management) of the Roseville City Code and the said project be reviewed and <br />26 approved by the Roseville City Engineer and the Rice Creek Watershed. <br />27 <br />28 89 Lastly, the Planning Division believes that there needs to be conditions regarding future <br />29 traffic increases and necessary improvements to the adjacent roadway (Lydia Avenue), <br />30 which have been addressed by Deb Bloom, City Engineer in the attached memo and the <br />31 conditions below. <br />32 <br />33 UTILITY SERVICE: <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />8.10 Utility plans showing existing and proposed watermain and sanitary sewer shall be <br />provided for the full campus. <br />STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY: <br />8.11 The Engineering Division has reviewed the Stormwater Management Study, which lays <br />out possible best management practices that would bring the site into compliance with <br />storm water regulations. Staff recommends that there be a condition in the PUD <br />requiring each stage of development to meet the regulatory standards in place at the time <br />of building pennit application. All stages of development should recognize the others to <br />ensure that a comprehensive storm water management plan is constructed for the site. <br />PF07-002_RCA_092407 Page 6 of l0 <br />