Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville, MN - Official Website <br />Klausing moved, Roe seconded, suspending Council Rules to extend the meeting curfew <br />to 11:00 p.m., and to complete this discussion and the Cent Ventures land use item. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined the need to limit agenda items and length to avoid <br />overloading agendas in an effort not to routinely exceed the 10:00 p.m. curfew. <br />Mayor Klausing noted the fact that land use issues had specific review periods and <br />asked individual Councilmembers to consider time efficiencies during discussions. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust; Roe; Ihlan; Kough; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that the EAW as submitted was incomplete, <br />inaccurate, and didn't support a negative declaration; and suggested that <br />the City Council delay their decision to request additional information <br />where available. Councilmember Ihlan provided her research of EQB <br />guidelines and threshold issues. Councilmember Ihlan questioned the <br />individual Councilmember review of agency comments, given the late <br />agenda packet delivery; and highlighted, for the record, specific <br />indications of those agencies, opining that it was more prudent to get <br />additional information before proceeding, as was the responsibility of the <br />RGU, and require an EIS. Councilmember Ihlan discussed specific lake <br />grades for Little Johanna and Johanna Lakes; feasibility of proposed <br />traffic mitigation strategies; stormwater outfall requirements related to <br />loss of woodland habitat; <br />Mr. Lindgren, with respect to Councilmember Ihlan, noted that the <br />applicant had provided responses to agency comments since ]une 20, <br />2007 to provide the City Council with that additional information specified <br />by the reviewing agencies, and as outlined in the draft resolution's <br />Findings of Fact. <br />City Attorney Anderson reviewed the process for sending the original <br />document to agencies for comment, and noted that the process <br />anticipated that comments would be made and responses would initially <br />be provided by the applicant and become part of the record. Mr. <br />Anderson opined that this was the environmental review process at work <br />to improve proposed projects as indicated with revisions to the proposed <br />Site and Master plans. <br />http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/archive.asp?AMID=&Type=&ADID=230 <br />Page 11 of 16 <br />09/24/2007 <br />