Laserfiche WebLink
Implementing a traffic signal at Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue <br />• Directing outbound right turns and inbound left tums to and from the west <br />via the College west gate during the p.m. peak hour and adding an <br />eastbound 150-foot left turn lane at fhe west gate and appropriate berming <br />on the south side of the intersection to accommodate inbound left turns <br />from the west and to mitigate potential impacts from car headlights to <br />residentia/ properties to the south. <br />• One additional exclusive eastbound left turn lane .' Snelling Avenue/Lydia <br />Avenue with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet (the College should <br />dedicate the right-of-way required on either side of Lydia Avenue to <br />accommodate the new lanes). ������ <br />���,N. <br />• Develop Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan ta'�"�' lement <br />institutional measures that wo ld further improve futur �' hour traffic <br />operations. <br />The Draft EAW did not reflect all o' e traffic mitigation measures. The EAW <br />will be updated to reflect this. <br />4. Comment: The EAW claims that there will'be no significant change in the noise <br />emissions from the Campus. The tree buffer between the Athletic fields and <br />Lydia were proposed to be removed in the plan pres�nted in April at the <br />Roseville Pla� ' Commission. How will the change m noise emissions be <br />handled w�fi - �. oval of the buffer? <br />Response: The proj���ed p/ans for building locations and landscaping on the <br />campus are conce #tJB/ at this time. The concept plan indicates that some trees <br />may need to be �-��� ccommodate new buildings. The College and <br />designers�will rrrinimiz� r��� �,"� °���� xisting trees to the extent that is possible in <br />deve/oping `the fina! plans. The = llege will submit final landscape plans to the <br />City prior to project initiation, and will include protection of existing trees, <br />screening, and a tre replacement program as part of the overall landscaping <br />plan. <br />5. Comment: The EAW does not address the visual impact of the field house <br />located as proposed to the Roseville Planning Commission. <br />Response: The College will save as much existing vegetation as is practical, <br />and will establish new vegetation to reduce the visual impacts of the proposed <br />improvements. The College does not anticipate adverse visual impacts such as <br />those identifred for EAW analysis (glare from intense lighting, large visible <br />smoke plumes, etc.) In terms to neighbors to the west of the site, the significant <br />wooded area surrounding the drainage creek west of the proposed fieldhouse <br />will not be changed. <br />6. Comment: The EAW does not address the impact to the bluff adjacent to Little <br />Lake Johanna as a result of the new field house location. <br />Response: As noted in the response to Question 16 of the EAW, "Steep slopes <br />exist near the project areas and extra care will be given to prevent erosion and <br />TKDA Project No. 13529.002 Page 8 Draft Dafe: July 9, 2007 <br />