Laserfiche WebLink
5. Comment: Snelling and Lydia: This intersection is already congested and <br />becoming more unfriendly to pedestrians. A particular danger is drivers turning <br />right. This development is next to a development for the aged. What is the effect <br />on their safety and well being in negotiating an intersection swollen by this huge <br />increase in Northwestern generated traffic? <br />Response: The estimated increase in College generated traffic is only a very <br />small percentage (about 2.2% in the a.m. peak and about 2.7% in the p.m.) of <br />total traffic moving through the intersection. The level of College fraffic for right <br />turns through the intersection is a6out 7% and 15% in the a.m. and p.m. peak <br />hours, respectively. These small increases in traffic will not significantly increase <br />safety hazards, and any potential safety impact of additional traffic will be <br />mitigated by proper timing of the traffic signal. At the completion of intersection <br />improvements, the traffic signal will need�to be retimed to account for future <br />��� <br />traffic and pedestrian movements and� - fely accommodate all pedestrian <br />crossings. <br />6. Comment: TH 51 (Snelling Aven �orth of Ly �a�will be impacted and most <br />travelers are using this intersection�With the �,u1`�nr�ver of these spaces the <br />volume of traffic will increase by thousands o'f cars on this section of Snelling. <br />Because this is a change from the current Conditions, I would like to request a <br />noise wall study, or other forms of mitigatior��� <br />Response: The traffic study indicated that increa�� in traffic on Snelling Avenue <br />over the next 20 years will come from increases i� ackground" fraffic from <br />many sourc�s� a��►.n�rell as some increase from Northwestern College. The City <br />may wish ta'workn`y� `` Ramsey County and Mn/DOT to monitor roadway noise <br />to determine wheth� ' verall traffic exceeds Minnesota noise standards. These <br />standards vary bas `: n surrounding land uses, and by time of day, with higher <br />noise��' ` Is allov�� 10:00 P. M. Potential strategies to address noise <br />impacts � v ��'jr �ai�� ,�d may include the following: <br />• Buffer Z���. � Residential areas may be buffered by non-residential land <br />uses locate �tdjacent to the roadway. <br />• Building Constr '� n Requirements: Specifying noise mitigation <br />construction materials and techniques can reduce the impact of traffic. <br />• Strategic Building Placement: Buildings can act as barriers if located to <br />protect areas for outdoor use or to protect residences. <br />• Noise Barriers: Noise barriers (e.g. walls or berms) between the roadway <br />and residential areas can be constructed to reduce noise impacts. The <br />effectiveness of barriers depends on the height and extent of the barriers <br />and the specific location of the barriers relative to the roadways and <br />residential areas. <br />Again, the increases in traffic on Snelling Avenue over the next 20 years will <br />come from increases in "background" traffic from many sources. The City may <br />wish to work with Ramsey County and Mn/DOT to monitor roadway noise and <br />determine if a noise study in appropriate and necessary. <br />TKDA Project No. 13529.002 Page 4 DraR Date: July 9, 2007 <br />