Laserfiche WebLink
5. Comment: Snelling and Lydia: This intersection is already congested and <br />becoming more unfriendly to pedestrians. A particular danger is drivers turning <br />right. This development is next to a development for the aged. What is the effect <br />on their safety and well being in negotiating an intersection swollen by this huge <br />increase in Northwestern generated traffic? <br />Response: The estimated increase in College generated traffic is only a very <br />smatl percentage (about 2.2% in the a.m. peak and about 2.7% in the p.m.) of <br />total traffic moving through the intersection. The level of College traffic for right <br />turns through fhe intersecfion is about 7% and 15% in the a.m. and p.m. peak <br />hours, respectively. These small increases in traffic will not significantly increase <br />safety hazards, and any potenfia! safety impact of additional traffic will be <br />mitigated by proper timing of the tratfic signal. At the completion of intersection <br />improvements, the traffic signal will need_to be retimed to account for fufure <br />��•: J <br />traffic and pedestrian movements and to,�fsafely accommodate all pedestrian <br />crossings. :���'�' <br />_� <br />6. Comment: TH 51 (Snelling Aver�ue)`:north of Lydia,rwill be impacted and most <br />travelers are using this intersection �;With the.tiirnover of these spaces the <br />volume of traffic will increase by thousai�ds'of,cars on this section of Snelling. <br />Because this is a change from the current conditions, I would like to request a <br />noise wall study, or other forms of mitigation ;;,,,a <br />,4esponse: The traff;c study rndicated th,at increa es��n trsffic on Snelling �ver,ue <br />over the next 20 years will come from increases iri�background" traffic from <br />many sources, �es well as some increase from Northwestern College. The City <br />may w�sh� to �work with Ramsey County and Mn/DOT to monitor roadway noise <br />to determme whether`overall traffic exceeds Minnesofa noise standards. These <br />�=;.: ti� <br />sfancJards vary based on surrounding land uses, and by time of day, with higher <br />� s� <br />noiseYlevels allowed beforE 10: 00 P. M. Potential strategies to address noise <br />impacts a]so�vary,by land uses; and may include the following: <br />�` ' `����r�;�"� <br />� <br />• Buffer Zones: Residential areas may be buffered by non-residential land <br />uses located.'adjacent to the roadway. <br />:r� <br />'���<��:.y� <br />Building Construction Requirements: Specifying noise mitigation <br />• construcfion materials and techniques can reduce the impact of traffic. <br />Strategic Building Placement: Buildings can act as barriers if located to <br />protect areas for outdoor use or to protect residences. <br />Noise Barriers: Noise barriers (e.g. walls or berms) between the roadway <br />and residential areas can be constructed to reduce noise impacts. The <br />effectiveness of barriers depends on the height and extent of the barriers <br />and the specific location of the barriers relative to the roadways and <br />residential areas. <br />Again, the increases in traffic on Snelling Avenue over the next 20 years will <br />come from increases in "background" traffic from many sources. The City may <br />wish to work wifh Ramsey County and Mn/DOT to monifor roadway noise and <br />determine if a noise study in appropriate and necessary. <br />TKDA Project No. 13529.002 Page 4 Draft Date: July 9, 2007 <br />