Laserfiche WebLink
-� <br />.-. <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CIT`Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 26��' day of March, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. <br />The following members were present: Pust, Ihlan, Kough, Roe, and Klausing; <br />and none were absent; <br />Council Member Pust introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0.10488 <br />A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY <br />EASEMENT IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY ADDRESSED AT <br />2700 SNELLING AVENUE (PF07-014) <br />WHEREAS, MSP Commercial in cooperation with JLT Roseville Corporate Center LLC <br />have requested the vacation of a portion of the pedestrian pathway easement that lies in the <br />northeast corner of the parcel, to necessitate the recording of the subdivision plat Venture 4th <br />Addition; and <br />WHEREAS, the current pedestrian pathway easement lies in the northeast corner of the <br />property at 2700 Snelling Avenue, legally described as: <br />LOT 3, BLOCK 1, VENTURE ADDITION <br />PIN: 13-29-23-33-0001 <br />WHEREAS, the original easement was recorded in 2003 (Document No. 3795937) and <br />provided the City with the land area necessary to construct a pedestrian trail around the adjacent <br />pond; and <br />WHEREAS, a the Ramsey County Surveyor has determined that the subdivision plat <br />approved by the Roseville City Council on July 19, 2006 cannot be recorded in its current state; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, The Roseville Planning Staff has concluded that the vacation and <br />rededication of the subject easement lying on Lot 3, Block 1, Venture Addition is the most <br />appropriate and practical method to allow the MSP Commercial land division to be recorded; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the <br />pedestrian pathway easement vacation on March 7, 2007 and voted (6-0) to recommend <br />approval, based on the findings of Section 5 of the Planning Commission project report dated <br />March 7, 2007; <br />1 of 3 <br />