pf07-006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� • ��E��II.I_I�; �'<�.k��iS .��t) �C�Z�,�.TIO??� CQ��'1�1��Sii�� i1'IIn'UTES OF MEETIl\G OF MARCH 6, 20�7 ROSEVILLE CITY HALL � 7:OOPR1 PRESENT: Brodt Lenz, Jacobson, Johnson, Kamrath, Kruzel, Pederson, Risto�ti-, Siark ABSENT: Willmus (called to notify staff of absence) STAFF: Brok}:e, Anfang, Schultz, Boettcher, Maxey, Cash, Evenson GLTESTS: Alex Hall; United Properties l. INTRODUCTIONS/ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT No Public Comment 2. APPROVAL OF R�Il�TUTES — MARCH 6, 2007 MEETING Commission Recommendation: Minutes of the March 6, 2007 meeting were unanimously approved. UNITED PROPERTIES SENIOR HOUSING PROPOSAL NEAR LANGTON LAKE PARK Staff introduced this topic and indicated that this agenda item was for information purposes only and a recommendation was not expected tonight. The staff's brief review included that: ■ United Properties is proposing a senior housing development on approximately 6 acres of land at 3010 Cleveland Avenue on the West side of Langton Lake Park near the soccer field. ■ There were 3 plans included in the cominission packet. Two preliminary site plans were from United Properties and the third plan is the adopted Langton Lake Park Master Plan. ■ Current access to the existing park parking lot is through the industrial ��arehouse parking lot on the south of the proposed development and existing park land. Staff also indicated that park related concems included, but are certainly not limited to: ■ The extreme sensitivity of any park land exchange! ■ Meeting the goals of the adopted park master plan and ensuring future public access to tl�e park. ■"I'he :;nportance �f consideration of the �xisting adopted park master plar. ■ Trail comiections to the park? Mr. Hall of United Properties presented the details of their two proposals and relayed information from recent neighborhood meetings; ■ First proposal does not change access to the park and the development is contained within the property lines of current ownership (this plan is preferred by Lnited Properties). ■ Second proposal involves a parkland exchange and includes a new road to access the existing park parking lot (will discuss further if City is interested). ■ A neighborhood meeting was held by United Properties for those that live on Brenner Avenue just bordering the site and :VIr. Hall stated that neighbor comments included the dislike for access to the development and park off Brenner Ave and concerns about the impact a four story building might have on the homes and yards to the north of the development. Commission asked a mzmber of questions related to the presented proposals. The primary discussions centered on ownership and who would be responsible for maintenance of thc road as ��ell as the importance of consideration of the adopted Langton Lake Master Plan. Commissioner Willmus was not able to be at the meeting but shared his thoughts in writing. Chair Johnson shared read those thoughts. Commissioner Willmus comments indicated that plan �1 and #2 do not confornl to the adopted Langton Lake Park Master Plan and fail to satisfy the requirements of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. Commission Reeommendation: I�To formal recommendation. Discussion centered on the importance of the adherence to the adopted Langton Lake Park Master Plan. O�'��K