pf07-006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. John Stark i March 29 200�" Page : i postly to the City in terms of�the lan Ui�i��iu�'��y at t��is �ucation. Further, it would be very ursuE �., , .... ..� � , , - _ d that they would need to acquire. If the goal of the City and the Parks and Recreation Commission is access to the park, then we should be focusing on the most "practical" access, not simply a plan that was put together many years ago, certain aspects of which may no longer be applicable. Our concern at this point is timing. As we have discussed, our Purchase Agreement requires us to have all of our City approval related Due Diligence completed by the end of June. It was our intent to pursue the attached plan with twin homes and no park access at the May 2"d Planning Commission meeting, moving on to the City Council later that month. This would give us a month to make any changes required by the City and still make our required Due Diligence date. If the City truly wants to pursue acquiring the land needed to follow the Langton Lake Park Master Plan, then we really need to understand that now so we can stop incurring costs on a plan that is no longer feasible. At this point, we are simply asking again for direction from the City on how we are to proceed based on our required timeline and the City's decision regarding park access. The Applewood Pointe Community that we previously built in Roseville has been a tremendous success — both for United Properties and the City of Roseville. There is certainly a need for additional independent senior living in this area, and we are excited about developing a second phase on this site. We have enjoyed a very productive relationship with the City and are confident that we will find a solution to this issue that works for both parties. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, �� Alex Hall Vice President Development C: Brian Carey Mark Nelson Thomas Paschke Enclosures AH/bls �