res_9653 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

17. The Palmer Trucking building just north of County Road C2 is a nuisance and should be painted per Section 407.02J of the City Code and prior to this interm use permit becoming effective. 18. All debris shall be removed from the site. 19. The setback area along County Road C2 must be landscaped similar to the landscaping along the south side of Berger Storage and Transfer's property (Boulevard trees in accordance with the Street Tree Master Plan - trees from the East-West County Road group planted no less than 35 feet on center.) as per Resolution 9454 dated August 25, 1997. The boulevard area adjacent County Road C2 shall include sod as opposed to seed. 20. The initial term of the interim use permit shall be for a period of five years. Upon review and hearing, the interim use permit may be issued for additional periods up to five years each. The Council may discontinue this interim use after fIVe (5) years for no cause, or at any time during the five (5) year interim use term for violations of Federal and State law, the City Code or this permit. 21. The interim use permit shall be reviewed administratively on an annual basis on the anniversary date of the resolution granting the interim use permit, with a staff report submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council as needed. 22. The storm water management plan for the property and the use of calcium chloride as a dust inhibitor must be reviewed and approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to occupation of the site. 23. The layout of the site shall be per the plan dated (accepted) April 7, 1999. 24. This interim use shall be restricted to the time period of no longer than from May 1 through October 1 of each year. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that an interim use permit to allow an "owner to buyer lot", on a vacant parcel located adjacent to 2205 West County Road C2, is hereby approved conditioned upon the above referenced conditions (#1-24). The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Goedeke, and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: Wiski, Maschka, Mastel, Goedeke and Wall and the following voted against the same: None WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.