Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />-. -. <br />Andrew Stark, 1009 Parker Avenue <br />Mr. Stark expressed concerns regarding the bus route during peak rush hour traffic; <br />and questioned whether any considerations had been provided for traffic control. <br />Discussion among staff, Commissioners, Mr. Stark and Mr. Grans included alternate <br />routes and safety considerations; monitoring by City personnel; traffic volume issues <br />at other sites, and staff monitoring as required; and normal traffic volumes regardless <br />of State Fair traffic. <br />George Edwards, 1032 Parker Avenue <br />Mr. Edwards strongly recommended that the route be left as is; expressing concerns <br />with on-street parking on Parker, and current church practice for parking overflow on <br />the grass and on the street by residential properties. <br />Discussion included current lack of restrictions and enforceability for on-street parking <br />unless signed; staffs lack of ability to monitor and/or resolve issues unless they're <br />notified. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that City Code stated that parking on the grass was prohibited, <br />and should be restricted to paved surfaces or the public street. <br />Carol Sultzdorf, 1056 Parker Avenue <br />Ms. Sultzdorf expressed profound disappointment that the permit seemed to be a <br />"done deal," with little consideration of or interest in residential concerns. Mr. <br />Sultrdorf noted the close proximity of residential property to the Calvary parking lot <br />and the disruption to their quality of life with bus traffic, headlights, fumes, people <br />noise; and questioned why commercial areas were not considered rather than <br />residential areas. <br />Ms. Sultzdorf noted ongoing issues residents already experienced and lack of <br />monitoring by the church on the site with excessive litter. <br />Joe Gross, 1036 W Burke <br />Mr. Gross shared the concerns expressed by Ms. Stulzdorf, with his property <br />immediately east of the church property; and questioned if residential housing was as <br />dense adjacent to other sites as to the Calvary site. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that residential housing at the other sites was probably denser, <br />with the majority of the sites within similar single-family neighborhoods. Mr. Paschke <br />advised that numerous commercial properties were also being utilized for park and <br />ride facilities, but were permitted uses versus the Interim Use Permit required in <br />residential areas, in order to condition their operation and terms. <br />Considerable discussion was held among staff, Commissioners and residents related <br />to the bus route related to Calvary; choice of which entrance at Calvary and rationale <br />for that choice; maneuverability of buses around the corners and at each entrance; <br />current use by residential traffic of the church lot as a shortcut to bypass tra�c on <br />Lexington; and policing and maintenance of the lot by State Fair personnel on each <br />site during the Fair. <br />Commissioner Gottfried sought clarification and discussed rationale from Mr. Grans <br />regarding the bus route related to safety, collector locations for loading and unloading <br />riders; passenger control and pedestrian traffic considerations and options; use of the <br />second entrance; maximizing available space; and payment by the Fair to their staff or <br />volunteer groups of a stipend for maintaining and monitoring each site. <br />