Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Debra Bloom, P.E. <br />City of Roseville <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />• <br />July 17, 2007 <br />Page 11 <br />Based on the analysis, the following conclusions and recommendations are offered for your <br />consideration: <br />• All key intersections curre:ltly operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the a.m. and <br />p.m. peak hours, with existing traffic controls and geometric layout. It is worth noting that <br />southbound left-turn queues at the Cleveland Avenue/County Road C intersection <br />occasionally extend back to the adjacent intersection (Cleveland Avenue/1-35W Northbound <br />Ramps) during the p.m. peak hour. <br />• The proposed development consists of a 120-room hotel and a 5,000 square foot high- <br />turnover sit-down restaurant. All parking is provided in a surface lot located on site. One <br />main access point is proposed to the site as a right-in/right-out only access. The intent is for <br />this access to service the entire site (hotel and restaurant). The right-in/right-out only access <br />drive is identified as a temporary access location, with plans to relocate the site access to the <br />south side of the parcel upon construction of the Future Twin Lakes Parkway (bordering the <br />south side of the property). The proposed access scenario is not desirable. The following <br />options are offered for consideration as improvements to site access and overall circulation: <br />1) Instead of the access as shown, it is recommended that the proposed development gain <br />access from the adjacent driveway to the south. The proposed parcel is located <br />immediately north of an existing (vacant) development with access directly across from <br />the Cleveland Avenue/I-35W Northbound Ramps intersection. This access driveway <br />would serve as the best access to the proposed site. The applicant should investigate <br />developing a cross access agreement that would allow access to the proposed hotel and <br />restaurant developments via this driveway. <br />2) It is recommended that the concrete median along Cleveland Avenue be extended further <br />north (approximately 100 feet) to discourage motorists exiting the proposed development <br />from making U-turns along Cleveland Avenue. In addition, the extended raised concrete <br />median shall be signed with "No U-turn Permitted," which is strictly enforceable by law. <br />• Under year 2009 build conditions, all key intersections will continue to operate at an <br />acceptable LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing traffic controls <br />and geometric layout. Although all key intersection will continue to operate at acceptable <br />levels-of-service, the proposed access along Cleveland Avenue is not ideal, causing unsafe <br />conditions along Cleveland Avenue with the potential for U-turns immediately north of this <br />site access. <br />• Based on our analysis results, the additional traffic from the proposed development can be <br />accommodated by the existing roadway network. However, our review of the proposed site <br />plan (although an interim condition) indicates that alternative access should be revisited and <br />reviewed. The proposed interim access will create an unsafe driving condition alon`� <br />Cleveland Avenue for both ne�,v patrons of the proposed development and everyday users oi� <br />Cleveland Avenue. <br />H:IProjects161661TSIReportIDRAFT Cleveland Note TS_071707.doc <br />