My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf07-033
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
2007
>
pf07-033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 9:46:25 AM
Creation date
6/17/2013 3:22:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
07-033
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
._ <br />Thomas Paschke <br />From: John Stark <br />Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:33 AM <br />To: Thomas Paschke; Bryan Lloyd <br />Cc: straight_haired_curly@yahoo.com <br />Subject: FW: 2950 Owasso Blvd Lot #34 driveway <br />Page 1 of 1 <br />Thomas & Bryan, <br />I accept this as evidence that the alternative of constructing a shared driveway for 2950 Owasso Blvd. lot #34 and the lot <br />immediately north is not a viable alternative. <br />I also visited the site with the property owner on Friday afternoon, and have come to the conclusion that paving the existing gravel <br />driveway would be less impactful on the wetland than installing a driveway outside the wetland setback and removing the existing <br />gravel drive - as this would affect drainage patterns and lead to exposed dirt and sendimentation concerns. <br />With this, I agree that we should support the wetland setback variance that is being sought. <br />-John <br />From: Kris Simonson [mailto:straight_haired_curly@yahoo.com] <br />Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 4:31 PM <br />To: John Stark <br />Subject: 2950 Owasso Blvd Lot #34 driveway <br />Dear Mr. Stark- <br />My husband and I have examined the possibility of installing a shared driveway along the property line for lots #33 and <br />#34. The following issues make it an impossible project. <br />1) I have spoken with the representative for the owner of I,ots #31-33. At this time, the owner is completely unwilling <br />to enter into any agreement involving installation of a joint driveway. He is attempting to sell Lots #31-33 and does not <br />wish to spend money improving those lots in any way. <br />2) As previously stated, Lots #31-33 are up for sale. They may be sold individually or in some combination. It may <br />happen this year or in 5 years, noone knows. Noone knows whether the future owner even plans to have a driveway on <br />Lot #33 so it would be impractical for there to be an agreement for a shared driveway. <br />Thank you for your time today and I am sorry that Deb Bloom was unable to view the site with us. If she wishes to <br />speak with me directly at any time, she can feel free to contact me. I am happy to answer any questions. I look forward <br />to working with the City over the next few years. Everyone has been extremely helpful to date. <br />Sincerely, <br />Kristine Simonson <br />Sucker-punch__spam with award-winning protection. <br />Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. <br />06/25/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.