Laserfiche WebLink
` <br />NARRATIVE FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION <br />Lot 34 of 2950 Owasso Blvd W. <br />,-� <br />We respectfully request a variance be issued for Lot 34 of Owasso Lake Park that <br />would allow us to improve the existing driveway in preparation for building a house on <br />the lot. The existing driveway was originally built to service the home at 2950 Owasso <br />Blvd W in the 1950's, but has not been used as such since the 1990's. In August of <br />2006, a small area south/southwest of the existing drive was classified as a Type 1 <br />wetland, a seasonally flooded basin (generally March through May). This creates a <br />conflict with the City Code 1016.16 which requires driveways to have a 30 foot setback <br />from any wetland. The existing driveway has a 10-19 foot setback from this newly <br />delineated marginal wetland. <br />Our plans for this property include building a LEED certified home and maintaining as <br />much of the natural state of the property as possible, including protecting the wetland <br />areas on the property. We want to maintain and protect the wooded nature of the lot <br />and limit any changes or plantings to predominantly native species. At first, we <br />assumed it would be best to relocate the driveway. After studying the lot drainage <br />patterns, major trees, and existing driveway location, it is clear to us that relocating the <br />driveway would be significantly more harmful to the property than a careful and <br />thoughtful improvement of the existing driveway. <br />Relocating the driveway would involve removat of a 13 inch diameter evergreen and <br />more than a dozen native deciduous trees. It would require 814 cubic yards of fill in a <br />low lying area which acts as a key drainage area for the street end of the lot, and <br />would destroy the area on the property which contains the greatest diversity of plants. <br />In addition, if we are required to relocate the driveway, we would have the problem of <br />the existing driveway still being present and unable to support tree growth or native <br />plantings without extensive excavation of the gravel base. Cost becomes a factor as <br />well, but mostly from the stand point of cost to the natural qualities of the lot. Driveway <br />relocation has a dollar cost close to three times as much as improving what exists <br />and at the same time destroys more in terms of the natural state of the land. <br />In contrast, the existing driveway can be improved without removing any trees except <br />to complete the buckthorn eradication. The only 3 species of wetland plants present <br />(box eider, American elm, and green ash trees) would not be harmed by having a <br />driveway closer than 30 feet. And most importantly, by regrading the existing driveway <br />to send runoff away from the wetland, water quality can be maintained or even <br />improved. <br />In conclusion, all indications are that this driveway setback variance will not have a <br />detrimental impact on this marginal wetland. <br />Kris Simonson <br />Stew Roberts <br />` � <br />